73.4. THE MAIN ESTIMATE 2477

Thus for t not in a set of measure zero off which BX (t) = B(X (t)) ,

⟨BX (t) ,X (t)⟩=∞

∑i=0⟨BX (t) ,ei⟩2 = sup

m

m

∑k=1⟨BX (t) ,ei⟩2

Now from the formula for BX (t) , it follows that BX is continuous into V ′. For any t /∈ N̂so that (BX)(t) = B(X (t)) in Lq′ (Ω;V ′) and letting tk → t where tk ∈ D, Fatou’s lemmaimplies

E (⟨BX (t) ,X (t)⟩) = ∑i

E(⟨BX (t) ,ei⟩2

)= ∑

ilim inf

k→∞E(⟨BX (tk) ,ei⟩2

)

≤ lim infk→∞

∑i

E(⟨BX (tk) ,ei⟩2

)= lim inf

k→∞E (⟨BX (tk) ,X (tk)⟩)

≤ C(||Y ||K′ , ||X ||K , ||Z||J ,∥⟨BX0,X0⟩∥L1(Ω)

)In addition to this, for arbitrary t ∈ [0,T ] , and tk→ t from D,

∑i⟨BX (t) ,ei⟩2 ≤ lim inf

k→∞∑

i⟨BX (tk) ,ei⟩2 ≤ sup

s∈D⟨BX (s) ,X (s)⟩

Hence

supt∈[0,T ]

∑i⟨BX (t) ,ei⟩2 ≤ sup

s∈D⟨BX (s) ,X (s)⟩

= sups∈D

∑i⟨BX (s) ,ei⟩2 ≤ sup

t∈[0,T ]∑

i⟨BX (t) ,ei⟩2

It follows that supt∈[0,T ] ∑i ⟨BX (t) ,ei⟩2 is measurable and

E

(sup

t∈[0,T ]∑

i⟨BX (t) ,ei⟩2

)≤ E

(sups∈D⟨BX (s) ,X (s)⟩

)≤ C

(||Y ||K′ , ||X ||K , ||Z||J ,∥⟨BX0,X0⟩∥L1(Ω)

)And so, for ω off a set of measure zero, supt∈[0,T ] ∑i ⟨BX (t) ,ei⟩2 is bounded above.

Also for t /∈ Nω and a given ω /∈ N, letting tk→ t for tk ∈ D,

⟨BX (t) ,X (t)⟩ = ∑i⟨BX (t) ,ei⟩2 ≤ lim inf

k→∞∑

i⟨BX (tk) ,ei⟩2

= lim infk→∞

⟨BX (tk) ,X (tk)⟩ ≤ supt∈D⟨BX (t) ,X (t)⟩

and sosupt /∈Nω

⟨BX (t) ,X (t)⟩ ≤ supt∈D⟨BX (t) ,X (t)⟩ ≤ sup

t /∈Nω

⟨BX (t) ,X (t)⟩

73.4. THE MAIN ESTIMATE 2477Thus for ¢ not in a set of measure zero off which BX (1) = B(X (t)),m(BX (t) ,X (t)) = y (BX (t) ,e)” = sup )° (BX (t),e7)°i=0 mM k=1Now from the formula for BX (ft), it follows that BX is continuous into V’. For any t ¢ Nso that (BX) (t) = B(X (t)) in LY (Q;V’) and letting % — t where t, € D, Fatou’s lemmaimpliesE ((BX (t),X(t))) =YE ((ex (r) .ei)”) = Yili inf £ ((ex (%) .ei)°)i k—-y00IAlim inf YE ((Bx (tz) .ei)”) = lim inf E ((BX (tx) .X (tx)))IAC (LWP I IX ls IZILs > IMBX0, Xo) ))In addition to this, for arbitrary t € [0,7], and % — ¢ from D,L¥ (BX (1) ,¢i)” < lim inf 97 (BX (i) ¢:)” < sup (BX (8) .X (s))Hencesup "(BX (1) ,e;)” <_ sup (BX (s) ,X (s))te(0,7] i seD= sup) (BX(s),e;)” < sup ¥ (BX (t), ei)”seD j te[0,T] iIt follows that sup,<jo,7) Li (BX (¢) ,e;)” is measurable ande( sup (BX 0") <E (sup (Bx (9). ()))telO,T] i seD<_ C(I Ula lI¥ lle lIZlly-IMBX0-X0)las(ay)And so, for @ off a set of measure zero, sup;<io,7] Li (BX (¢) ,e;)” is bounded above.Also for t ¢ Nw and a given @ ¢ N, letting t, > t for % € D,(BX (1),X(t)) = (BX (1) ,¢1)* < lim int )" (BX (1) ,€)”L= Tim inf (BX (4,).X (h)) <sup (BX (0) X (0)and sosup (BX (t),X (t)) < sup (BX (t) ,X (t)) < sup (BX (t) ,X (1))ttéNo teD téNo