2694 CHAPTER 79. INCLUDING STOCHASTIC INTEGRALS

+

(∫Ω

∥Φn∥2L∞([0,T ],L2)

)1/2(∫Ω

∫ T

0⟨Bur−Bu,ur−u⟩dtdP

)1/2

(79.1.30)

Letting the ei be the special vectors of Theorem 77.2.19,∫Ω

∫ T

0⟨Bur−Bu,ur−u⟩dtdP =

∫Ω

∫ T

0∑

i⟨Bur−Bu,ei⟩2 dtdP

=∫

∫ T

0∑

ilim inf

p→∞

⟨Bur−Bup,ei

⟩2 dtdP

≤ lim infp→∞

∫Ω

∫ T

0∑

i

⟨Bur−Bup,ei

⟩2 dtdP

= lim infp→∞

∫Ω

∫ T

0∑

i

⟨Bur−Bup,ei

⟩2 dtdP

= lim infp→∞

∫Ω

∫ T

0

⟨Bur−Bup,ur−up

⟩dtdP

Now by 79.1.17, the last expression is no larger than T/2r and so∫Ω

∫ T

0⟨Bur−Bu,ur−u⟩dtdP≤ T

2r

Then, from 79.1.30,

E(∣∣∣∣∫ T

0

(Φr ◦ J−1)∗Bur ◦ JdW −

∫ T

0

(Φ◦ J−1)∗Bu◦ JdW

∣∣∣∣)

≤(∫

supt⟨Bur (t) ,ur (t)⟩dP

)1/2(∫Ω

∫ T

0∥Φr−Φ∥2 dt

)1/2

+C(

T2r

)1/2

≤C(∫

∫ T

0∥Φr−Φ∥2 dt

)1/2

+C(

T2r

)1/2

<C2−r +C(

T2r

)1/2

which clearly converges to 0 as r→ ∞. Since the right side is summable, one obtains alsopointwise convergence. This proves the claim.

From the above considerations using the space V̂ , it follows that this u is the same asthe one just obtained in the sense that for ω off N, the two are equal for a.e. t. Thuswe take u to be this common function. Hence there is a set of measure zero such that(t,ω)→XNC u(t,ω) is progressively measurable in the above convergences. Also, thisshows that we are taking u ∈ Lp ([0,T ]×Ω;V ). From the measurability of ur, u, we canobtain a dense countable subset {tk} and an enlarged set of measure zero N such that forω /∈ N,Bu(tk,ω) = B(u(tk,ω)) and Bur (tk,ω) = B(ur (tk,ω)) for all tk and r. This usesthe same argument as in Lemma 73.3.1.

It remains to verify that z(·,ω) ∈ A(u(·,ω) ,ω). It follows from the above consid-erations that the Ito formula above can be used at will. Assume that for a given ω /∈

2694 CHAPTER 79. INCLUDING STOCHASTIC INTEGRALS1/2 r 1/2+ (flenllwon.) (if (Bu — Basu —u) dedP ) (79.1.30)Letting the e; be the special vectors of Theorem 77.2.19,T TLf (Bu, Bu, —u)ardP = | | Y (Bu, — Bu, e;)” dtdPalo alo &T~ I [ Yim inf, (Bu; — Bup,e;) dtdPiT< lim inf | [ Y (Buy — Bup,e;)” dtdPQI0 5p79}T= lim inf | [ Y (Buy — Bup,e;)” dtd Palo &poeT= lim int | | (Bu, — Bup,uy — up) dtdPQOpreNow by 79.1.17, the last expression is no larger than T /2” and soT T[ [ (Bu, — Bu,u, —u) dtdP < —aJo 2”Then, from 79.1.30,T Ti (6,07!) Bu-osaw — [ (®os"!)’ BuoJaw |)0 JO1/2 T 1/2 r\ 12< (/ sup (Bu(*),ur(0))aP (ff |, @|Par) +¢(5)Qt QJ0 2”T 1/2 1/2 1/2<e([, | |e, —@|Par) +¢e(5) <cr'sc(Z)Ja Jo 2" 2"which clearly converges to 0 as r — oo. Since the right side is summable, one obtains alsopointwise convergence. This proves the claim.From the above considerations using the space V, it follows that this u is the same asthe one just obtained in the sense that for @ off N, the two are equal for a.e. ¢. Thuswe take u to be this common function. Hence there is a set of measure zero such that(t,@) + Xycu(t,@) is progressively measurable in the above convergences. Also, thisshows that we are taking uw € L? ((0,7] x Q;V). From the measurability of u,, u, we canobtain a dense countable subset {t;,} and an enlarged set of measure zero N such that foro ¢ N,Bu(t,,@) = B(u(t,,@)) and Bu, (t.,@) = B(u; (t,,@)) for all t, and r. This usesthe same argument as in Lemma 73.3.1.It remains to verify that z(-,@) € A(u(-,@),@). It follows from the above consid-erations that the Ito formula above can be used at will. Assume that for a given @ ¢