2690 CHAPTER 79. INCLUDING STOCHASTIC INTEGRALS

Now the right side converges to 0 as m,n→ ∞ and so there is a subsequence, denoted withthe index k such that whenever m > k,

E

(sup

t∈[0,T ]⟨Buk−Bum,uk−um⟩(t)

)≤ 1

2k

Note how this implies ∫Ω

∫ T

0⟨Buk−Bum,uk−um⟩dtdP≤ T

2k (79.1.17)

Then consider the martingales Mk (t) considered earlier. One of these is of the form

Mk =∫ t

0

(Φk ◦ J−1)∗Buk ◦ JdW

Then by the Burkholder Davis Gundy inequality and modifying constants as appropriate,

E((Mk−Mk+1)

∗)≤C

∫Ω

(∫ T

0

∥∥∥(Φk ◦ J−1)∗Buk−(Φk+1 ◦ J−1)∗Buk+1

∥∥∥2dt)1/2

dP

≤C∫

( ∫ T0 ∥Φk−Φk+1∥2 ⟨Buk,uk⟩

+∥Φk+1∥2 ⟨Buk−Buk+1,uk−uk+1⟩dt

)1/2

dP

≤ C∫

(∫ T

0∥Φk−Φk+1∥2 ⟨Buk,uk⟩dt

)1/2

+C∫

(∫ T

0∥Φk+1∥2 ⟨Buk−Buk+1,uk−uk+1⟩dt

)1/2

dP

≤C∫

supt⟨Buk,uk⟩1/2

(∫ T

0∥Φk−Φk+1∥2 dt

)1/2

dP

+C∫

supt⟨Buk−Buk+1,uk−uk+1⟩1/2

(∫ T

0∥Φk+1∥2 dt

)1/2

dP

≤C(∫

supt⟨Buk,uk⟩dP

)1/2(∫Ω

∫ T

0∥Φk−Φk+1∥2 dtdP

)1/2

+C(∫

supt⟨Buk−Buk+1,uk−uk+1⟩dP

)1/2(∫Ω

∫ T

0∥Φk+1∥2 dtdP

)1/2

From the above inequality, 79.1.15 and after adjusting the constants, the above is nolarger than an expression of the form C

( 12

)k/2which is a summable sequence. Then

∑k

∫Ω

supt∈[0,T ]

|Mk (t)−Mk+1 (t)|dP < ∞

2690 CHAPTER 79. INCLUDING STOCHASTIC INTEGRALSNow the right side converges to 0 as m,n — © and so there is a subsequence, denoted withthe index k such that whenever m > k,1E| sup (Buy —Bum,ug—Um) (t) | < 5kte[0,T]Note how this impliesr T| I (Bug — Bum, Ug —Um) dtdP < — (79.1.17)a Jo 2kThen consider the martingales M; (t) considered earlier. One of these is of the formt *M, = [ (@,0J7!)° Buz oJdW0Then by the Burkholder Davis Gundy inequality and modifying constants as appropriate,E (Me — Mc+1)")r x « 2 1/2<c | (/ [(@co) Buy — (®x410J7') Bu i) “a \Jo1/2<c[( [oe — Pell? (Buse) ) dP~ JQK +x pall (Bue — Bug, ue — Uey1) atT 5 1/2< cf. (/ | Pe — Bx || (Bu, dt)r 1/2+c |, (/ evil? (Bu, — Buh ~ tas) dt) dPT 1/2<C } sup (Bug, ux)!” (/ |®x — Px Par) dPQt 0T 1/2+€ [sup (Buy — Bugsy —ups.1)!/? (/ Nea Par) dPt1/2 T<e([ sup Bus.) dP ) (ff | Bis? ded?)Q 1 ado1/2 T+ ( [sup (Bi — Bush ness) dP) (ff ||P dar )tFrom the above inequality, 79.1.15 and after adjusting the constants, the above is nok/21/21/2larger than an expression of the form C (5) which is a summable sequence. Thenr/ sup |M (t) —Mx+1 (t)|dP <k %2te[0,7]