2604 CHAPTER 77. STOCHASTIC INCLUSIONS

Proof: This follows right away from Tychonoff’s theorem and the compactness of theembedding of the Holder space into C ([0,1]).

Now, for m∈N and φ ∈V ′, define lm(t)≡max(0, t− (1/m)) and ψm,φ : V →C ([0,T ])by

ψm,φ u(t)≡∫ T

0

⟨mφX[lm(t),t] (s) ,u(s)

⟩V ds = m

∫ t

lm(t)⟨φ ,u(s)⟩V ds.

Here, X[lm(t),t] (·) is the characteristic function of the interval [lm(t), t] and ⟨·, ·⟩V = ⟨·, ·⟩Vis the duality pairing between V and V ′.

Let D = {φ r}∞

r=1 denote a countable subset of V ′. Then the pairs (φ ,m) for φ ∈D and

m ∈ N form a countable set. Let(

mk,φ rk

)denote an enumeration of the pairs (m,φ) ∈

N×D . To simplify the notation, we set

fk (u)(t)≡ ψmk,φ rk(u)(t) = mk

∫ t

lmk (t)

⟨φ rk

,u(s)⟩

Vds.

For fixed ω /∈ N and k, the functions{

t→ fk (u j (·,ω))(t)}

j are uniformly bounded

and equicontinuous because they are in C0,1/p′ ([0,T ]). Indeed, we have for ω /∈ N,

∣∣ fk (u j (·,ω))(t)∣∣ =

∣∣∣∣∣mk

∫ t

lmk (t)

⟨φ rk

,u j (s,ω)⟩

Vds

∣∣∣∣∣≤ m

∥∥∥φ rk

∥∥∥T 1/p′∣∣∣∣∫ T

0

∥∥u j (s,ω)∥∥p

V ds∣∣∣∣1/p

≤C (ω)m∥∥∥φ rk

∥∥∥V ′

T 1/p′

and for t ≤ t ′ ∣∣ fk (u j (·,ω))(t)− fk (u j (·,ω))(t ′)∣∣

∣∣∣∣∣mk

∫ t

lmk (t)

⟨φ rk

,u j (s,ω)⟩

Vds−mk

∫ t ′

lmk (t′)

⟨φ rk

,u j (s,ω)⟩

Vds

∣∣∣∣∣≤ 2mk

∣∣t ′− t∣∣1/p′C (ω)

∥∥∥φ rk

∥∥∥V ′.

By Lemma 77.2.11, the set of functions{XNC (ω) f(u j (·,ω))

}∞

j=n is pre-compact in X =

∏k C ([0,T ]) . We now define a set valued map Γn : Ω→ X by

Γn (ω)≡ ∪ j≥n

{XNC (ω) f(u j (·,ω))

},

where the closure is taken in X . Then Γn (ω) is the closure of a pre-compact set in X andso Γn (ω) is compact in X . From the definition, a function f is in Γn (ω) if and only ifd (f,XNC (ω) f(wl))→ 0 as l→ ∞, where each wl is one of the u j (·,ω) for j ≥ n. In thetopology on X , this happens iff for every k,

fk (t) = liml→∞

mk

∫ t

lmk (t)

⟨φ rk

,XNC (ω)wl (s,ω)⟩

Vds,

where the limit is the uniform limit in t.

2604 CHAPTER 77. STOCHASTIC INCLUSIONSProof: This follows right away from Tychonoff’s theorem and the compactness of theembedding of the Holder space into C([0,1]). WlNow, form € N and @ € V’, define /,,(¢) = max (0, — (1/m)) and 9,9: ¥ + C([0,T])byT tYngl)= [Pm Zineai(s)-uls))yds=m [ (.u(s)ivdsHere, 2j,,(c)) (-) is the characteristic function of the interval [Jn(t),t] and (-,-)y = (+5-)yis the duality pairing between V and V’.Let J = {@,}-, denote a countable subset of V’. Then the pairs (@,m) for @ € Z andm € N form a countable set. Let (m. () ns) denote an enumeration of the pairs (m,@) €N x J. To simplify the notation, we setFel) = Vin, (WO =m fling (t)(6,,,u(s)), ds.For fixed @ ¢ N and k, the functions {t + f; (uj (-,@)) (t)}, are uniformly boundedand equicontinuous because they are in C°!/”" ([0,7]). Indeed, we have for @ ¢ N,t4s dm Io (6,,,uj(s,@)), ds[ \us.0)|hh asfic (uj(-,@)) (1)] =TileIA1/p<C(o)m|m |,r, rileVvand fort < ¢’|i (uj (-,@)) (t) — fa (uj (-,@)) (¢') |mi | 1 (Purts(s@)), sme ( (Ont ls), aMy My !%,,IAIA2m, |t! —1|""" C(o)|viBy Lemma 77.2.11, the set of functions { 2iyc (@) f(u;(-,@)) }°jan is pre-compact in X =Th C ((0,7]) . We now define a set valued map I” : Q > X byI" (@) = Ujsn { 2c (@) £ (uj (-,@))},where the closure is taken in X. Then I” (@) is the closure of a pre-compact set in X andso I” (@) is compact in X. From the definition, a function f is in I” (q@) if and only ifd (f, Zyc (@)£(w;)) + 0 as 1 > o, where each w, is one of the u;(-,@) for j > n. In thetopology on X, this happens iff for every k,fx (t) = lim my | a Coe yc (@) wy (s,@)), ds,[400where the limit is the uniform limit in f.