2424 CHAPTER 70. MEASURABILITY WITHOUT UNIQUENESS
Each of these integrals on the right side converge to 0 because, from the strong convergenceresults,
F((ukn−g)+
)(∣∣vkT − U̇T ±wT∣∣− ∣∣vkT − U̇T
∣∣)converges in L1
([0,T ] ,L1 (ΓC)
)and so the weak ∗ convergence to 0 of
ψ−h′(1/k)
(∣∣vkT − U̇T∣∣)
implies that these integrals converge to 0. Thus the integral in 70.5.61∫ T
0
∫ΓC
F((ukn−g)+
)(ψ−h′(1/k)
(∣∣vkT − U̇T∣∣))ξ k ·wT dαdt
is between two sequences each of which converges to 0 so it also converges to 0.To save space, denote by
µ̂ = ν(∣∣vT − U̇T
∣∣)−ψ
Then passing to the limit in this subsequence, we obtain for fixed ω the existence of asolution to the following integral equation.
v(t)−v0 +∫ t
0Mvds+
∫ t
0Auds+
∫ t
0Puds+
∫ t
0γ∗T F((un−g)+
)µ̂ξ ds =
∫ t
0fds
(70.5.62)where
u(t) = u0 +∫ t
0v(s)ds (70.5.63)
and(∣∣vkT − U̇T
∣∣ , µ̂) is contained in the graph of µ a.e. Also for each w ∈ V ,∫ T
0
∫ΓC
ξ ·wT dαds≤∫ T
0
∫ΓC
∣∣vkT − U̇T +wT∣∣− ∣∣vkT − U̇T
∣∣dαds (70.5.64)
The remaining issue concerns the existence of a measurable solution. However, thisfollows in the same way as before from the measurable selection theorem, Theorem 70.2.1.From the above reasoning, for fixed ω any sequence has a subsequence which leads to asolution to the integral equation 70.5.62 - 70.5.64 which is continuous into V ′. There isalso an estimate of the right sort for all of the vk. Therefore, from this theorem, there is afunction v(·,ω) in V ′ which is weakly continuous into V ′ and a sequence vk(ω) (·,ω) con-verging to v(·,ω). Then from the above argument, a subsequence converges to a solutionto the integral equation and since both are weakly continuous into V ′, it follows that thesolution to the integral equation equals this measurable function for all t, this for each ω .Thus there is a measurable solution to the stochastic friction problem. The result is statedin the following theorem.
Theorem 70.5.3 For each ω let u0 (ω) ∈V,v0 (ω) ∈H. Let f ∈ V ′. Also assume the gap gand sliding velocity U̇T are F measurable. Then there exists a solution v, to the problemsummarized in 70.5.62 - 70.5.64 for each ω . This solution (t,ω)→ v(t,ω) is measurableinto V ′,H ′ and V ′.
It only remains to check the last claim about measurability into the other spaces. Bydensity of V into H, it follows that H ′ is dense in V ′ and so a simple Pettis theorem argumentimplies right away that ω → v(t,ω) is F measurable into both V and H.