2420 CHAPTER 70. MEASURABILITY WITHOUT UNIQUENESS

∫ t

0γ∗T F((un−g(ω))+

)µ(∣∣vT − U̇T

∣∣)ψ′ε

(vT − U̇T

)ds)=∫ t

0fds (70.5.54)

Thus t → v(t,ω) is continuous into V ′. This along with the estimate 70.5.44, impliesthat the conditions of Theorem 70.2.1 are satisfied. It follows that there is a function v̄which is product measurable into V ′ and weakly continuous in t and for each ω, a subse-quence vk(ω) such that vk(ω) (·,ω)⇀ v̄(·,ω) in V ′. Then by a repeat of the above argument,for each ω, there exists a further subsequence still denoted as vk(ω) which converges in V ′

to v(·,ω) which is a solution to the above integral equation which is continuous into V ′.Hence, v̄(·,ω) = v(·,ω) and since these are both weakly continuous into V ′ they must bethe same function. Hence, there is a product measurable solution v.

Next we pass to a limit as ε → 0. Denoting the product measurable solution to theabove integral equation as vk, where ε = 1/k. The estimate 70.5.42 is obtained as before.Then we get a subsequence, still denoted as vk which has the same convergences as in70.5.46 - 70.5.53. Thus we obtain these convergences along with the fact that vk is productmeasurable and for each ω, it is a solution of

vk (t)−v0 +∫ t

0Mvkds+

∫ t

0Aukds+

∫ t

0Pukds+

∫ t

0γ∗T F((ukn−g(ω))+

)µ(∣∣vkT − U̇T

∣∣)ψ′1/k

(vkT − U̇T

)ds =

∫ t

0fds (70.5.55)

Now in addition to these convergences, we can also obtain

ψ′1/k

(vkT − U̇T

)⇀ ξ in L∞

([0,T ] ;L∞ (ΓC)

3)

We have also

ψ′1/k

(vkT − U̇T

)·wT ≤ ψ1/k

(vkT − U̇T +wT

)−ψ1/k

(vkT − U̇T

)and so, passing to a limit, using the strong convergence of vkT to vT in L2 ([0,T ] ;W ) ,uniform convergence of ψ1/k to ∥·∥ , and pointwise convergence in W, we obtain using thedominated convergence theorem that for w ∈ V ,∫ t

0

∫ΓC

F((ukn−g(ω))+

)µ(∣∣vkT − U̇T

∣∣)ψ′1/k

(vkT − U̇T

)·wT dxds

→∫ t

0

∫ΓC

F((un−g(ω))+

)µ(∣∣vT − U̇T

∣∣)ξ ·wT dxds

where ∫ t

0

∫ΓC

ξ ·wT dαds≤∫ t

0

∫ΓC

∣∣vkT − U̇T +wT∣∣− ∣∣vkT − U̇T

∣∣dαds (70.5.56)

Then passing to the limit in the integral equation 70.5.55, we obtain that v is a solution foreach ω to the integral equation

v(t)−v0 +∫ t

0Mvds+

∫ t

0Auds+

∫ t

0Puds+

2420 CHAPTER 70. MEASURABILITY WITHOUT UNIQUENESS[ VF ((un—8(@)),.) H(|vr —Ur]) yi (vr —Ur) as) = [ fds (70.5.54)Thus ¢ — v(t, @) is continuous into V’. This along with the estimate 70.5.44, impliesthat the conditions of Theorem 70.2.1 are satisfied. It follows that there is a function Vwhich is product measurable into V’ and weakly continuous in ¢ and for each @, a subse-quence Vx(q) such that vj, ¢) (-,@) +¥(-,@) in ¥’. Then by a repeat of the above argument,for each @, there exists a further subsequence still denoted as vj() which converges in ¥ ’to v(-,@) which is a solution to the above integral equation which is continuous into V’.Hence, ¥(-,@) = v(-,@) and since these are both weakly continuous into V’ they must bethe same function. Hence, there is a product measurable solution v.Next we pass to a limit as € — 0. Denoting the product measurable solution to theabove integral equation as v;, where € = 1/k. The estimate 70.5.42 is obtained as before.Then we get a subsequence, still denoted as v; which has the same convergences as in70.5.46 - 70.5.53. Thus we obtain these convergences along with the fact that v;, is productmeasurable and for each @, it is a solution oft t tVi ()—vo+ | Myjds-+ [ Auds+ [ Puyds+0 0 0t t[ VF ((uen — 8(@)),) MH (|ver — Ur]) Wi je (Ver — Ur) ds = [ fds (70.5.55)Now in addition to these convergences, we can also obtainWin (Ver —Ur) — & in L* ((0.71 ;L” (Te)*)We have also, . . .Wie (vir —Ur)-wr < Vis (ver —Ur + wr) — Wisk (ver — Ur)and so, passing to a limit, using the strong convergence of vyr to vr in L?({0,T];W),uniform convergence of Yj /; to ||-|| , and pointwise convergence in W, we obtain using thedominated convergence theorem that for w € V,[¥en —#(0)),) 4 (par —Ur) vi (¥er—Ur) wre= [ [Fl e(@))allvr—Ur))é-wrdeswhere[ [: “wrdads [ [ ver — Ur +wr| — |ver —Ur| dads (70.5.56)Then passing to the limit in the integral equation 70.5.55, we obtain that v is a solution foreach @ to the integral equationt rt otv(t) —vo+ f Mvas-+ | Auds-+ | Puds+0 0 0