190 CHAPTER 8. DETERMINANTS

11. ↑Letting p(t) denote the characteristic polynomial of A, show that pε (t)≡ p(t− ε)is the characteristic polynomial of A+ εI. Then show that if det(A) = 0, it followsthat det(A+ εI) ̸= 0 whenever |ε| is sufficiently small but nonzero.

12. In constitutive modeling of the stress and strain tensors, one sometimes considerssums of the form ∑

∞k=0 akAk where A is a 3×3 matrix. Show using the Cayley Hamil-

ton theorem that if such a thing makes any sense, you can always obtain it as a finitesum having no more than 3 terms.

13. Recall you can find the determinant from expanding along the jth column. det(A) =∑i Ai j (cof(A))i j Think of det(A) as a function of the entries, Ai j. Explain why the

i jth cofactor is really just ∂ det(A)∂Ai j

.

14. Let U be an open set in Rn and let g :U→Rn be such that all the first partial deriva-tives of all components of g exist and are continuous. Under these conditions formthe matrix Dg (x) given by Dg (x)i j ≡

∂gi(x)∂x j≡ gi, j (x) The best kept secret in cal-

culus courses is that the linear transformation determined by this matrix Dg (x) iscalled the derivative of g and is the correct generalization of the concept of deriva-tive of a function of one variable. Suppose the second partial derivatives also existand are continuous. Then show that ∑ j (cof(Dg))i j, j = 0. Hint: First explain why∑i gi,k cof(Dg)i j = δ jk det(Dg) . Next differentiate with respect to x j and sum on jusing the equality of mixed partial derivatives. Assume det(Dg) ̸= 0 to prove theidentity in this special case. Then explain using Problem 11 why there exists a se-quence εk→ 0 such that for gεk

(x)≡ g (x)+εkx, det(Dgεk

)̸= 0 and so the identity

holds for gεk. Then take a limit to get the desired result in general. This is an ex-

tremely important identity which has surprising implications. One can build degreetheory on it for example. It also leads to simple proofs of the Brouwer fixed pointtheorem from topology.

15. A determinant of the form ∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣

1 1 · · · 1a0 a1 · · · an

a20 a2

1 · · · a2n

......

...an−1

0 an−11 · · · an−1

n

an0 an

1 · · · ann

∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣is called a Vandermonde determinant. Show it equals ∏0≤i< j≤n (a j−ai). By this ismeant to take the product of all terms of the form (a j−ai) such that j > i. Hint:

Show it works if n = 1 so you are looking at

∣∣∣∣∣ 1 1a0 a1

∣∣∣∣∣ . Then suppose it holds for

n− 1 and consider the case n. Consider the polynomial in t, p(t) which is obtained

from the above by replacing the last column with the column(

1 t · · · tn)T

.

Explain why p(a j) = 0 for i = 0, · · · ,n−1. Explain why p(t) = c∏n−1i=0 (t−ai) . Of

course c is the coefficient of tn. Find this coefficient from the above description of

19011.12.13.14.15.CHAPTER 8. DETERMINANTS+Letting p(t) denote the characteristic polynomial of A, show that pe (t) = p(t—€)is the characteristic polynomial of A + €7. Then show that if det (A) = 0, it followsthat det (A + €7) £ 0 whenever |é| is sufficiently small but nonzero.In constitutive modeling of the stress and strain tensors, one sometimes considerssums of the form )9 a,A* where A is a3 x3 matrix. Show using the Cayley Hamil-ton theorem that if such a thing makes any sense, you can always obtain it as a finitesum having no more than 3 terms.Recall you can find the determinant from expanding along the j” column. det (A) =LiAij (cof (A));; Think of det (A) as a function of the entries, Ajj. Explain why thea det(A)ij'’ cofactor is really just TAiLet U be an open set in R” and let g : U — R” be such that all the first partial deriva-tives of all components of g exist and are continuous. Under these conditions formthe matrix Dg (x) given by Dg (x);; = ete) = gi; (a) The best kept secret in cal-culus courses is that the linear transformation determined by this matrix Dg (a) iscalled the derivative of g and is the correct generalization of the concept of deriva-tive of a function of one variable. Suppose the second partial derivatives also existand are continuous. Then show that ));(cof(Dg));; ; = 0. Hint: First explain whyLigix cof (Dg);; = 6 jx det (Dg). Next differentiate with respect to x; and sum on jusing the equality of mixed partial derivatives. Assume det (Dg) 4 0 to prove theidentity in this special case. Then explain using Problem 11 why there exists a se-quence €, — 0 such that for g,, (w) =g (a) + €xa@, det (Dg, ) #0 and so the identityholds for g,,. Then take a limit to get the desired result in general. This is an ex-tremely important identity which has surprising implications. One can build degreetheory on it for example. It also leads to simple proofs of the Brouwer fixed pointtheorem from topology.A determinant of the formao a| eee an2 2 2a a eae ann—1 n—1 n—1a a, eae ann n na ay eee anis called a Vandermonde determinant. Show it equals [To<i<j<n (aj — ai). By this ismeant to take the product of all terms of the form (a;—a;) such that j >i. Hint:1 1Show it works if n = 1 so you are looking at . Then suppose it holds fora ajn—1 and consider the case n. Consider the polynomial in t, p(t) which is obtained1Ttoe mm).Explain why p(a;) =0 for i=0,--» ,2—1. Explain why p(t) =c]]59 (t—ai). Ofcourse c is the coefficient of t”. Find this coefficient from the above description offrom the above by replacing the last column with the column (