78.3. RELAXED COERCIVITY CONDITION 2673

Then picking η small enough, we obtain CBλ (ω)ηr/2 < ε/2.Both operators εF and A(·,ω) are pseudomonotone as maps from X to P (X ′) where

X is defined in terms of UrI as before. Therefore, the existence of the measurable solutionis obtained.

Denoting with uε the above solution, suppose Luε → Lu weakly in U ′r with Lu =

(Bu)′ ∈ V ′ and uε → u weakly in V and u∗ε → u∗ in V ′,εFuε → 0 strongly in U ′r . Thus,

passing to the limit in 78.3.25 we obtain Lu ∈ V ′ because it equals something in V ′. Wewill show this below by an argument that εFuε → 0 strongly in U ′

r .Written differently, the uε satisfy the following for all v ∈ X .∫ T

0⟨Luε ,v⟩+ ⟨Buε ,v⟩(0)+

∫ T

0⟨u∗ε ,v⟩

∫ T

0⟨Fuε ,uε⟩=

∫ T

0⟨ f ,v⟩+ ⟨Bv(0) ,u0⟩ (78.3.27)

andBuε (t) = Bu0 +

∫ t

0Luε (s)ds

The weak convergence of Luε implies that Buε (t)→ Bu(t) in U ′. Thus

Bu(t) = Bu0 +∫ t

0Lu(s)ds

and so Bu(0) = Bu0. We will show that there exist suitable subsequences such that the kindof convergence just described will hold.

Using the equation to act on u in 78.3.25 or in 78.3.27, we obtain from the assumedcoercivity condition the following for fixed ω,

12⟨Bu,u⟩(t)− 1

2⟨Bu,u⟩(0)+ ε

∫ t

0||u||rU ds+δ (ω)

∫ t

0∥u∥p

V ds−m(ω)

≤ λ (ω)∫ t

0⟨Bu,u⟩(s)ds+

∫ t

0⟨ f ,u⟩(s)ds (78.3.28)

From Gronwall’s inequality, one obtains an estimate of the form

⟨Bu,u⟩(t)+ ε

∫ T

0||u||rU ds+

∫ T

0||u||pV ds≤C ( f ,ω)

where the constant depends only on the indicated quantities. It follows from this and thedefinition of the duality map F that if uε is the solution to Lemma 78.3.1, then εFuε → 0strongly in U ′

r . Also, the estimates for A and the above estimate implies that Luε is boundedin U ′

r . Thus we have an inequality of the form

⟨Buε ,uε⟩(t)+ ε

∫ T

0||uε ||rU ds+ ||uε ||pV + ||Luε ||U ′r + ||u

∗ε ||V ′ ≤C ( f ,ω)

Of course each of these uε ,u∗ε are measurable into V and U ′ respectively. By densityconsiderations, u∗ε is also measurable into V ′. It follows from Theorem 78.1.3 that there

78.3. RELAXED COERCIVITY CONDITION 2673Then picking 7 small enough, we obtain Cpa (@) n"/? < €/2.Both operators €F and A (-,@) are pseudomonotone as maps from X to Y (X’) whereX is defined in terms of Y%,; as before. Therefore, the existence of the measurable solutionis obtained. JDenoting with ug the above solution, suppose Lug + Lu weakly in %! with Lu =(Bu)' € V' and ue — u weakly in V and uz > u* in V',eF ue — 0 strongly in %!. Thus,passing to the limit in 78.3.25 we obtain Lu € VY’ because it equals something in ¥’. Wewill show this below by an argument that €Fug — 0 strongly in %,.Written differently, the ug satisfy the following for all v € X.[ (Lute,v) + (Bue,v) +f (u,v)+e [ " (Pue.ue) = [ Up») + (Bv(0) ,u0) (78.3.27)and :Bug (t) = Buo +f Lug (s) ds0The weak convergence of Lug implies that Bug (t) > Bu(t) in U'. ThustBu(t) = Bug +f Lu(s)ds0and so Bu (0) = Bug. We will show that there exist suitable subsequences such that the kindof convergence just described will hold.Using the equation to act on uw in 78.3.25 or in 78.3.27, we obtain from the assumedcoercivity condition the following for fixed a,1 1 t t ,5 (Bu.u) (1) — 5 (Buu) (0)+e [|lullg.ds+8(o) [ull ds—m(o)0 0t t< A(o) | (Bu,u) (s)ds-+ [ (f,u) (s)ds (78.3.28)0 0From Gronwall’s inequality, one obtains an estimate of the formT TBuu(o)-+e | |ulleas | |lullpas<C(f.0)0 0where the constant depends only on the indicated quantities. It follows from this and thedefinition of the duality map F that if ug is the solution to Lemma 78.3.1, then eFug — 0strongly in %/. Also, the estimates for A and the above estimate implies that Lug is boundedin %/. Thus we have an inequality of the formT(Bue, Ue) (+e | ILuelli ds + [ue|l'y + [Luella + |luellyr < CF, @)Of course each of these ue,u; are measurable into ¥ and Y’ respectively. By densityconsiderations, u; is also measurable into ¥'. It follows from Theorem 78.1.3 that there