77.7. PROGRESSIVELY MEASURABLE SOLUTIONS 2641

Also let t→ q(t,ω) be continuous and q is progressively measurable into V. Suppose thereis at most one solution to

Bu(t,ω)+∫ t

0z(s,ω)ds =

∫ t

0f (s,ω)ds+Bu0 (ω)+Bq(t,ω) , (77.7.72)

for each ω . Then the solution u to the above integral equation is progressively measur-able and so is z. Moreover, for each ω , both Bu(t,ω) = B(u(t,ω)) a.e. t and z(·,ω) ∈A(u(·,ω) ,ω). Also, for each a ∈ [0,T ] ,

Bu(t,ω)+∫ t

az(s,ω)ds =

∫ t

af (s,ω)ds+Bu(a,ω)+Bq(t,ω)−Bq(a,ω)

Proof: By Theorem 77.5.7 there exists a solution to 77.7.72 which is B ([0,T ])×FTmeasurable. Now, as in the proof of Theorem 77.5.7 one can define a new operator

Ar (w,ω)≡ A(ω,w+qτr (·,ω))

where τr is the stopping time defined there. Then, since q is progressively measurable, theprogressively measurable condition is satisfied for this new operator. Hence by Theorem77.7.3 there exists a unique solution wr which is progressively measurable to the integralequation

Bwr (t,ω)+∫ t

0zr (s,ω)ds =

∫ t

0f (s,ω)ds+Bu0 (ω)

where zr (·,ω) ∈ Ar (w(·,ω) ,ω). Then as in Theorem 77.7.3 you can let r→ ∞ and even-tually qτr (·,ω) = q(·,ω). Then, passing to a limit, it follows that for a given ω, there is asolution to

Bw(t,ω)+∫ t

0z(s,ω)ds =

∫ t

0f (s,ω)ds+Bu0 (ω)

z(·,ω) ∈ A(w(·,ω)+q(·,ω) ,ω)

which is progressively measurable because w(·,ω) = limr→∞ wr (·,ω) in V each wr beingprogressively measurable. Note how uniqueness for fixed ω is important in this argument.Recall that

τr ≡ inf{t : |q(t,ω)|> r}

By continuity, eventually, for a given ω,τr = ∞ and so no further change takes place inqτr (·,ω) for that ω. By uniqueness, the same is true of the solution wr (·,ω) and so point-wise convergence takes place for the wr. Without uniqueness holding, this becomes veryunclear. Thus for each T̂ < T,ω → w(·,ω) is measurable into V[0,T̂ ]. Then by Lemma77.4.2, w has a representative in V for each ω such that the resulting function satisfies(t,ω)→X[0,T̂ ] (t)w(t,ω) is B

([0, T̂])×FT̂ measurable into V . Thus one can assume

that w is progressively measurable. Now as in Theorem 77.5.7, Define u = w+q.The last claim follows from letting t = a in the top equation and then subtracting this

from the top equation with t > a.

77.7. PROGRESSIVELY MEASURABLE SOLUTIONS 2641Also let t +> q(t, @) be continuous and q is progressively measurable into V. Suppose thereis at most one solution toBu(t, @) + [ras o)ds = [fe @) ds + Bug (@)+Bq(t,@), (77.7.72)0 0for each w. Then the solution u to the above integral equation is progressively measur-able and so is z. Moreover, for each @, both Bu(t,@) = B(u(t,@)) ae. t and z(-,@) €A(u(-,@),@). Also, for each a € [0,T],Bu(t,0)+ ['z(s,0)ds= |” f(s,0)ds+Bu(a,0) + Bq (t,@) ~Ba(a,0)Proof: By Theorem 77.5.7 there exists a solution to 77.7.72 which is @([0,T]) x Frmeasurable. Now, as in the proof of Theorem 77.5.7 one can define a new operatorA, (w,@) =A(@,w+q"" (-,@))where T, is the stopping time defined there. Then, since g is progressively measurable, theprogressively measurable condition is satisfied for this new operator. Hence by Theorem77.7.3 there exists a unique solution w, which is progressively measurable to the integralequationBw-(t,0)+ ['a(s,0)d0= | f(s,0)ds+Buo (0)where z, (-,@) € A; (w(-,@),@). Then as in Theorem 77.7.3 you can let r — oo and even-tually g* (-,@) =q(-,@). Then, passing to a limit, it follows that for a given @, there is asolution toBw(t,0)+ [ 2(s,00)ds = [ £(0,0)ds-+Buo(0)z(-,@) € A(w(-,@)+q(-,@),@)which is progressively measurable because w(-,@) = lim,_,..W; (-,@) in V each w, beingprogressively measurable. Note how uniqueness for fixed @ is important in this argument.Recall thatT, = inf {t: |g (t,@)| >r}By continuity, eventually, for a given @,T, = and so no further change takes place inq*' (-,@) for that @. By uniqueness, the same is true of the solution w, (-,@) and so point-wise convergence takes place for the w,. Without uniqueness holding, this becomes veryunclear. Thus for each 7 < 7,@ — w(-,@) is measurable into %o i}: Then by Lemma77.4.2, w has a representative in Y for each @ such that the resulting function satisfies(t,@) > Zon (t)w(t,@) is B([0,7]) x Fp measurable into V. Thus one can assumethat w is progressively measurable. Now as in Theorem 77.5.7, Define u = w+q.The last claim follows from letting t = a in the top equation and then subtracting thisfrom the top equation witht >a. fj