2546 CHAPTER 76. IMPLICIT STOCHASTIC EQUATIONS
Lemma 76.3.4 Suppose fn is progressively measurable and converges weakly to f̄ in
Lα ([0,T ]×Ω,X ,B ([0,T ])×FT ) , α > 1
where X is a reflexive separable Banach space. Also suppose that for each ω /∈ N a set ofmeasure zero,
fn (·,ω)→ f (·,ω) weakly in Lα (0,T,X)
Then there is an enlarged set of measure zero, still denoted as N such that for ω /∈ N,
f̄ (·,ω) = f (·,ω) in Lα (0,T,X) .
Also f̄ is progressively measurable.
Proof: By the Pettis theorem, f̄ is progressively measurable. Letting
φ ∈ Lα ′ ([0,T ]×Ω,X ′,B ([0,T ])×FT),
it is known that for a.e. ω,∫ T
0⟨φ (t,ω) , fn (t,ω)⟩dt→
∫ T
0⟨φ (t,ω) , f (t,ω)⟩dt
Therefore, the function of ω on the right is at least FT measurable. Now let
g ∈ L∞(Ω,X ′,FT
)and let ψ ∈C ([0,T ]). Then for 1 < p≤ α,∫
Ω
∣∣∣∣∫ T
0⟨g(ω)ψ (t) , fn (t,ω)⟩dt
∣∣∣∣p dP
≤ C (T )∫
Ω
∥g∥pL∞(Ω,X ′)
∫ T
0|ψ (t)|p ∥ fn (t,ω)∥p
X dtdP
≤ C (T,g,ψ)∫
Ω
∫ T
0∥ fn (t,ω)∥p
X dtdP≤C < ∞
for some C. Since∫ T
0 ⟨g(ω)ψ (t) , fn (t,ω)⟩dt is bounded in Lp (Ω) independent of nbecause
∫Ω
∫ T0 ∥ fn (t,ω)∥p
X dtdP is given to be bounded, it follows that the functions
ω →∫ T
0⟨g(ω)ψ (t) , fn (t,ω)⟩dt
are uniformly integrable and so it follows from the Vitali convergence theorem that∫Ω
∫ T
0⟨g(ω)ψ (t) , fn (t,ω)⟩dtdP→
∫Ω
∫ T
0⟨g(ω)ψ (t) , f (t,ω)⟩dtdP
But also from the assumed weak convergence to f̄∫Ω
∫ T
0⟨g(ω)ψ (t) , fn (t,ω)⟩dtdP→
∫Ω
∫ T
0
〈g(ω)ψ (t) , f̄ (t,ω)
〉dtdP