2490 CHAPTER 73. THE HARD ITO FORMULA, IMPLICIT CASE

qk−1

∑j=1

∫ t j+1

t j

⟨Y (s) ,X r

k (s)−X lk (s)−Pn

(Mr

k (s)−Mlk (s)

)⟩ds

=∫ t

t1

⟨Y (s) ,X r

k (s)−X lk (s)−Pn

(Mr

k (s)−Mlk (s)

)⟩ds

where Mrk denotes the step function

Mrk (t) =

mk−1

∑i=0

M (ti+1)X(ti,ti+1] (t)

and Mlk is defined similarly. The term∫ t

t1

⟨Y (s) ,Pn

(Mr

k (s)−Mlk (s)

)⟩ds

converges to 0 for a.e. ω as k→ ∞ thanks to continuity of t → M (t). However, more isneeded than this. Define the stopping time

τ p = inf{t > 0 : ∥M (t)∥W > p} .

Then τ p = ∞ for all p large enough, this for a.e. ω. Let

Ak =

[∣∣∣∣∫ t

t1

⟨Y (s) ,Pn

(Mr

k (s)−Mlk (s)

)⟩ds∣∣∣∣> ε

]

P(Ak) =∞

∑p=0

P(Ak ∩ ([τ p = ∞]\ [τ p−1 < ∞])) (73.7.32)

NowP(Ak ∩ ([τ p = ∞]\ [τ p−1 < ∞]))≤ P(Ak ∩ ([τ p = ∞]))

≤ P([∣∣∣∣∫ t

t1

⟨Y (s) ,Pn

((Mτ p)r

k (s)− (Mτ p)lk (s)

)⟩ds∣∣∣∣> ε

])This is so because if τ p = ∞, then it has no effect but also it could happen that the defin-ing inequality may hold even if τ p < ∞ hence the inequality. This is no larger than anexpression of the form

Cn

ε

∫Ω

∫ T

0∥Y (s)∥V ′

∥∥∥(Mτ p)rk (s)− (Mτ p)l

k (s)∥∥∥

WdsdP (73.7.33)

The inside integral converges to 0 by continuity of M. Also, thanks to the stopping time,the inside integral is dominated by an expression of the form∫ T

0∥Y (s)∥V ′ 2pds

and this is a function in L1 (Ω) by assumption on Y . It follows that the integral in 73.7.33converges to 0 as k→ ∞ by the dominated convergence theorem. Hence

limk→∞

P(Ak ∩ ([τ p = ∞])) = 0.

2490 CHAPTER 73. THE HARD ITO FORMULA, IMPLICIT CASE5 pr (¥ (8) Xf (s) = Xi (s) — Pa (Mtg (s) —MU(s)) )asj=l 74= f(r ().XE(s) -¥f06)—P, (ME (6) —Mk(s)) astwhere M7 denotes the step functionm1M. (t) = y? M (tis1) K tptis] (t)i=0and Mi. is defined similarly. The termtJ (x6) Pa (Mes) —ME(9)) bastconverges to 0 for a.e. @ as k + co thanks to continuity of t > M(t). However, more isneeded than this. Define the stopping timeTp =inf{t >0:||M(t)|ly > p}.Then tT, = ~ for all p large enough, this for a.e. @. LetA=| >|P(Ax) = VY) P(AKA ([tp = 9] \ [tp-1 < &])) (73.7.32)p=0(6) .Ps (mes) —Mh(9))) astyNowP(AKN ([Tp = >] \ [Tp-1 < ])) < P(AK A ([tp = &]))<P(|| f(r ().r ((wing(o)('”),(6)) )as| > e] )tyThis is so because if T, =o, then it has no effect but also it could happen that the defin-ing inequality may hold even if tT, < o hence the inequality. This is no larger than anexpression of the formSE iroThe inside integral converges to 0 by continuity of M. Also, thanks to the stopping time,the inside integral is dominated by an expression of the form(M*)¢(s) — (M")e (3), asaP (73.17.33)T[liv 20asand this is a function in L! (Q) by assumption on Y. It follows that the integral in 73.7.33converges to 0 as k — by the dominated convergence theorem. Hencejim P (Ax a ([Tp =])) =0.