2462 CHAPTER 73. THE HARD ITO FORMULA, IMPLICIT CASE

Lemma 73.1.2 Let fn→ f in Lp ([0,T ]×Ω,E) . Then there exists a subsequence nk and aset of measure zero N such that if ω /∈ N, then

fnk (·,ω)→ f (·,ω)

in Lp ([0,T ] ,E) and for a.e. t.

Proof: We have

P([∥ fn− f∥Lp([0,T ],E) > λ

])≤ 1

λ

∫Ω

∥ fn− f∥Lp([0,T ],E) dP

≤ 1λ∥ fn− f∥Lp([0,T ]×Ω,E)

Hence there exists a subsequence nk such that

P([∥∥ fnk − f

∥∥Lp([0,T ],E) > 2−k

])≤ 2−k

Then by the Borel Cantelli lemma, it follows that there exists a set of measure zero N suchthat for all k large enough and ω /∈ N,∥∥ fnk − f

∥∥Lp([0,T ],E) ≤ 2−k

Now by the usual arguments used in proving completeness, fnk (t)→ f (t) for a.e.t.Because of this lemma, it can also be assumed that for a.e. ω, pointwise convergence

is obtained on [0,T ] as well as convergence in Lp ([0,T ]). This kind of assumption will betacitly made whenever convenient.

Also recall the diagram for the definition of the integral which has values in a Hilbertspace W .

U↓ Q1/2

U1 ⊇ JQ1/2U J←1−1

Q1/2U

Zn ↘ ↓ Z

W

The idea was to get∫ t

0 ZdW where Z ∈ L2([0,T ]×Ω;L2

(Q1/2U,W

)). Here W (t) was a

cylindrical Wiener process. This meant that it was a Q1 Wiener process on U1 for Q1 = JJ∗

and J was a Hilbert Schmidt operator mapping Q1/2U to U1. To get∫ t

0 ZdW, Z ◦ J−1 wasapproximated by a sequence of elementary functions {Zn} having values in L (U1,W ) .Then ∫ t

0ZdW ≡ lim

n→∞

∫ t

0ZndW

and this limit exists in L2 (Ω,W ) and is independent of the choice of U1 and J. In fact, U1can be assumed to be U .

2462 CHAPTER 73. THE HARD ITO FORMULA, IMPLICIT CASELemma 73.1.2 Let f, > f in L? ([0,T] x Q,E). Then there exists a subsequence ng and aset of measure zero N such that if @ ¢ N, thenSng (-,@) > f(,@)in LP ([0,T],E) and for ae. t.Proof: We haveIALpP ( Wi — f\lx>(o,r),2) > a]) x [ Il fn — f ll-o((o,7),£) 4PlA1Zz Il fn — f llo((0,7) x2.)Hence there exists a subsequence nx such thatP( [Lim —J'LP((0,T],E) > 2*)) <2*Then by the Borel Cantelli lemma, it follows that there exists a set of measure zero N suchthat for all k large enough and @ ¢ N,| Fin — floor) <2"Now by the usual arguments used in proving completeness, f,, (t) > f(t) fora.e.t. WlBecause of this lemma, it can also be assumed that for a.e. @, pointwise convergenceis obtained on [0,7] as well as convergence in L? ([0,7]). This kind of assumption will betacitly made whenever convenient.Also recall the diagram for the definition of the integral which has values in a Hilbertspace W.UL Qi?U; DvJo'/u é o!/2uJ—Zn x + 4WwThe idea was to get {j ZdW where Z € L? ((0,T] x Q;H (Q'/?U,W)). Here W (rt) was acylindrical Wiener process. This meant that it was a Q; Wiener process on U; for Q; = JJ*and J was a Hilbert Schmidt operator mapping 0'/2U to U;. To get fo ZdW, ZoJ~! wasapproximated by a sequence of elementary functions {Z,,} having values in # (U,,W).Thent t| ZdW = lim | Z,dW0 nyo Jand this limit exists in L? (Q,W) and is independent of the choice of U; and J. In fact, U;can be assumed to be U.