63.8. LEVY’S THEOREM 2171

complements. Let K denote those sets which are finite intersections of sets of the form(X (u)−X (r))−1 (B) where B is a Borel set and r≤ u≤ s. Say a set, A of K is of the form

∩mi=1 (X (ui)−X (ri))

−1 (Bi)

Then since disjoint increments are independent, linear combinations of the random vari-ables, X (ui)−X (ri) are normally distributed. Consequently,

(X (u1)−X (r1) , · · · ,X (um)−X (rm) ,X (t)−X (s))

is multivariate normal. The covariance matrix is of the form(A 00 t− s

)and so the random vector, (X (u1)−X (r1) , · · · ,X (um)−X (rm)) and the random variableX (t)−X (s) are independent. Consequently, XA is independent of X (t)−X (s) for anyA ∈ K . Then by the lemma on π systems, Lemma 12.12.3 on Page 329, Fs ⊇ G ⊇σ (K ) = Fs. This proves the claim.

Thus ∫A(X (t)−X (s))dP =

∫Ω

(X (t)−X (s))XAdP

= P(A)∫

(X (t)−X (s))dP = 0

which shows that since A ∈Fs was arbitrary,

E (X (t) |Fs) = X (s)

and {X (t)} is a martingale.Now consider whether

{X (t)2− t

}is a martingale. By assumption,

L (X (t)−X (s)) = L (X (t− s)) = N (0, t− s) .

Then for A ∈Fs, the independence of XA and X (t)−X (s) shows∫A

E((X (t)−X (s))2 |Fs

)dP =

∫A(X (t)−X (s))2 dP

= P(A)(t− s) =∫

A(t− s)dP

and since A ∈Fs is arbitrary,

E((X (t)−X (s))2 |Fs

)= t− s

and so the result follows from Lemma 63.8.2. This proves the theorem.The next lemma is the main result from which Levy’s theorem will be established.

63.8. LEVY’S THEOREM 2171complements. Let .% denote those sets which are finite intersections of sets of the form(X (uw) —X (r)) | (B) where B is a Borel set and r <u <5. Say aset, A of % is of the formPh (X (ui) —X (r))' (Bi)Then since disjoint increments are independent, linear combinations of the random vari-ables, X (u;) — X (r;) are normally distributed. Consequently,(X (ur) —X (11) .-+* -X (tm) — X (Fm) +X (t) — X (s))is multivariate normal. The covariance matrix is of the formA 00 t-sand so the random vector, (X (u;) —X (r1),--- ,X (um) —X (7m)) and the random variableX (t) —X (s) are independent. Consequently, 24 is independent of X (+) — X (s) for anyA€£. Then by the lemma on z systems, Lemma 12.12.3 on Page 329, ¥, DY D0 (.#) = F,. This proves the claim.Thus[x@-x()ap = [ (&-X(s)) ParA Q— P(A) |, (X (1) —X (s)) dP =0which shows that since A € .¥, was arbitrary,E (X (t) | Fs) =X (s)and {X (t)} is a martingale.Now consider whether 4 X (t)* - rt is a martingale. By assumption,L (X (t) —X (s)) = & (X (t—s)) =N(0,t-5).Then for A € ¥,, the independence of 24 and X (t) — X (s) shows[e(&@-x0)P|#)aP = [ K—x()PaPP(A) (t—s)(t—s)dPAand since A € -F, is arbitrary,E ((x (1) —X (s)) |F.) =t-sand so the result follows from Lemma 63.8.2. This proves the theorem.The next lemma is the main result from which Levy’s theorem will be established.