862 APPENDIX A. THE THEORY OF THE RIEMANNN INTEGRAL∗

The following is a simple corollary to this theorem.

Corollary A.6.3 Let φ : [a,b]→ [c,d] be one to one and suppose φ′ exists and is continuous

on [a,b]. Then if f is a continuous function defined on [a,b] ,∫R

X[a,b](φ−1 (x)

)f (x)dx =

∫R

X[a,b] (t) f (φ (t))∣∣φ ′ (t)∣∣dt

Lemma A.6.4 Let h : V → Rn be a C1 function and suppose H is a compact subset of V .Then there exists a constant C independent of x ∈ H such that

|Dh(x)v| ≤C |v| .

Proof: Consider the compact set H× ∂B(0,1) ⊆ R2n. Let f : H× ∂B(0,1)→ R begiven by f (x,v) = |Dh(x)v|. Then let C denote the maximum value of f . It follows thatfor v ∈ Rn, ∣∣∣∣Dh(x)

v

|v|

∣∣∣∣≤C

and so the desired formula follows when you multiply both sides by |v|. ■

Definition A.6.5 Let A be an open set. Write Ck (A;Rn) to denote a Ck function whosedomain is A and whose range is in Rn. Let U be an open set in Rn. Then h ∈Ck

(U ;Rn

)if there exists an open set V ⊇ U and a function g ∈ C1 (V ;Rn) such that g = h on U.f ∈Ck

(U)

means the same thing except that f has values in R. Also recall that x ∈ ∂Umeans that every open set which contains x contains points of U and points of UC

Theorem A.6.6 Let U be a bounded open set such that ∂U has zero content and let h ∈C(U ;Rn

)be one to one and Dh(x)−1 exists for all x ∈U. Then h(∂U) = ∂ (h(U)) and

∂ (h(U)) has zero content.

Proof: Let x ∈ ∂U and let g = h where g is a C1 function defined on an open setcontaining U . By the inverse function theorem, g is locally one to one and an open mappingnear x. Thus g (x) = h(x) and is in an open set containing points of g (U) and points ofg(UC). These points of g

(UC)

cannot equal any points of h(U) because g is one to onelocally. Thus h(x) ∈ ∂ (h(U)) and so h(∂U) ⊆ ∂ (h(U)). Now suppose y ∈ ∂ (h(U)).By the inverse function theorem y cannot be in the open set h(U). Since y ∈ ∂ (h(U)),every ball centered at y contains points of h(U) and so y ∈ h(U) \h(U). Thus thereexists a sequence, {xn} ⊆ U such that h(xn)→ y. But then, by the continuity of h−1

which comes from the inverse function theorem, xn→ h−1 (y) and so h−1 (y) /∈U but isin U . Thus h−1 (y) ∈ ∂U . (Why?) Therefore, y ∈ h(∂U) , and this proves the two sets areequal. It remains to verify the claim about content.

First let H denote a compact set whose interior contains U which is also in the interiorof the domain of g. Now since ∂U has content zero, it follows that for ε > 0 given, thereexists a grid G such that if G ′ are those boxes of G which have nonempty intersection with∂U , then

∑Q∈G ′

v(Q)< ε

and by refining the grid if necessary, no box of G has nonempty intersection with both Uand HC. Refining this grid still more, you can also assume that for all boxes in G ′,

lil j

< 2

862 APPENDIX A. THE THEORY OF THE RIEMANNN INTEGRAL*The following is a simple corollary to this theorem.Corollary A.6.3 Let @ : [a,b] — [c,d] be one to one and suppose @' exists and is continuouson |a,b|. Then if f is a continuous function defined on [a,b],[en (O) F@)ax= [ ay OFOW)|o latLemma A.6.4 Let h : V > R” be aC! function and suppose H is a compact subset of V.Then there exists a constant C independent of x € H such that|Dh (x) v| <Clv}.Proof: Consider the compact set H x 0B(0,1) C R*”. Let f: H x 0B(0,1) > R begiven by f (x,v) =|Dh (ax) v|. Then let C denote the maximum value of f. It follows thatfor v € R",<CDn (x)||and so the desired formula follows when you multiply both sides by |v|. IDefinition A.6.5 Let A be an open set. Write C* (A;IR") to denote a C* function whosedomain is A and whose range is in R". Let U be an open set in R". Then h € Ck (U;R")if there exists an open set V > U and a function g € C'(V;IR") such that g=h on U.feck (U) means the same thing except that f has values in R. Also recall that x € OUmeans that every open set which contains x contains points of U and points of UCTheorem A.6.6 Let U be a bounded open set such that OU has zero content and let h €C (U;IR") be one to one and Dh (a)~' exists for all x € U. Then h(QU) = 0 (h(U)) and0 (h(U)) has zero content.Proof: Let « € dU and let g=h where g is a C! function defined on an open setcontaining U. By the inverse function theorem, g is locally one to one and an open mappingnear x. Thus g(x) = h(a) and is in an open set containing points of g (U) and points ofg (US). These points of g (US) cannot equal any points of h (U) because g is one to onelocally. Thus h(a) € 0(h(U)) and soh(dU) C 0(h(U)). Now suppose y € 0(h(U)).By the inverse function theorem y cannot be in the open set h(U). Since y € 0(h(U)),every ball centered at y contains points of h(U) and so y € h(U)\h(U). Thus thereexists a sequence, {a,} C U such that h(a,) > y. But then, by the continuity of h~!which comes from the inverse function theorem, 2, — h~! (y) and so h~! (y) ¢ U but isin U. Thus h~! (y) € OU. (Why?) Therefore, y € h (QU), and this proves the two sets areequal. It remains to verify the claim about content.First let H denote a compact set whose interior contains U which is also in the interiorof the domain of g. Now since 0U has content zero, it follows that for € > 0 given, thereexists a grid Y such that if Y’ are those boxes of Y which have nonempty intersection withOU, then¥ v(Q)<eQeyY'and by refining the grid if necessary, no box of Y has nonempty intersection with both Uand H©. Refining this grid still more, you can also assume that for all boxes in Y’,li<2i