35.6. FUNCTIONS DIFFERENTIABLE ON A DISK, ZEROS 715

Observation 35.6.7 Suppose ∑∞n=0 anhn converges for |h|< r. Then

limh→0

1hk

∑n=k+1

anhn = 0

To see this, note the expression is h∑∞n=k+1 anhn−(k+1). Now the sum of the absolute values

is ∑∞n=k+1 |an| |h|n−(k+1) and it converges because there exists ĥ, such that r >

∣∣ĥ∣∣> |h| andby the root test, Theorem 13.7.1, limsupn→∞ |an|1/n ∣∣ĥ∣∣≤ 1 so

lim supn→∞

|an|1/n |h|< 1

Now applying this to the sum in question,

lim supn→∞

|an|1/n |h|n−(k+1)

n = lim supn→∞

|an|1/n |h|< 1

Also the sum decreases in |h| and so

limh→0

∣∣∣∣∣h ∞

∑n=k+1

anhn−(k+1)

∣∣∣∣∣≤ limh→0|h|

∑n=k+1

|an| |h|n−(k+1) = 0

The tail of the series just described is sometimes referred to as “higher order terms”.

The following is a remarkable result about the zeros of an analytic function on a con-nected open set. It turns out that if the set of zeros have a limit point, then the functionends up being zero. It is an illustration of how analytic functions are a lot like polynomialswhich have finitely many zeros unless they are identically zero.

Definition 35.6.8 Suppose f is an analytic function defined near a point, α where f (α) =0. Thus α is a zero of the function f . The zero is of order m if f (z) = (z−α)m g(z) whereg is an analytic function which is not equal to zero at α.

Theorem 35.6.9 Let Ω be a connected open set (region) and let f : Ω→ C be analytic.Then the following are equivalent.

1. f (z) = 0 for all z ∈Ω

2. There exists z0 ∈Ω such that f (n) (z0) = 0 for all n.

3. There exists z0 ∈Ω which is a limit point of the set,

Z ≡ {z ∈Ω : f (z) = 0} .

Proof: It is clear the first condition implies the second two.Suppose the third holds. Then for z near z0

f (z) =∞

∑n=k

f (n) (z0)

n!(z− z0)

n

where k ≥ 1 since z0 is a zero of f . Suppose k < ∞. Then,

f (z) = (z− z0)k g(z)

35.6. FUNCTIONS DIFFERENTIABLE ON A DISK, ZEROS 715Observation 35.6.7 Suppose V9 anh" converges for |h| <r. Then1 colim — anh” =0ho hk LX "To see this, note the expression is hYy 441 anh" *+))_ Now the sum of the absolute valuesis Pr ps1 [Qn alr) and it converges because there exists h, such that r > |h| > |h| andby the root test, Theorem 13.7.1, limsup,_,.. lan |i!" || <1solim sup |an|!/" |h| <1n—-ooNow applying this to the sum in question,n—(k+1)lim sup |ap|!/"|h| = lim sup la|!/"|A| <1n—-eo n—-ooAlso the sum decreases in |h| and solimh + h- (k+1)h—0 yan< lim |h| lan| ||") =0n=k+1 A+ »n=k+1The tail of the series just described is sometimes referred to as “higher order terms”.The following is a remarkable result about the zeros of an analytic function on a con-nected open set. It turns out that if the set of zeros have a limit point, then the functionends up being zero. It is an illustration of how analytic functions are a lot like polynomialswhich have finitely many zeros unless they are identically zero.Definition 35.6.8 Suppose f is an analytic function defined near a point, a where f (a) =0. Thus a is a zero of the function f. The zero is of order m if f (z) = (z—@)"" g(z) whereg is an analytic function which is not equal to zero at Q.Theorem 35.6.9 Let Q be a connected open set (region) and let f :Q — C be analytic.Then the following are equivalent.1. f(z) =O forall z€Q2. There exists 7 € Q such that f“) (zo) = 0 for all n.3. There exists z € Q which is a limit point of the set,Z={zE€Q: f(z) =0}.Proof: It is clear the first condition implies the second two.Suppose the third holds. Then for z near zoco f(r)f(2) _ ys 0) (z—z0)"nwhere k > | since Zo is a zero of f. Suppose k < 0. Then,Ff (2) = (z-z0)* 8 (2)