4.2. LAPLACE TRANSFORMS 49

To see this, use integration by parts.Now assuming that |φ (u)| ≤Ceλu, then from what was just shown,

kk+1

k!

∫∞

0

(e−uu

)kφ (u)du−φ (1) =

∫∞

0

kk+1

k!(e−uu

)k(φ (u)−φ (1))du

Assuming φ is continuous at 1, the improper integral is of the form∫ 1−δ

0

kk+1

k!(e−uu

)k(φ (u)−φ (1))du+

∫ 1+δ

1−δ

kk+1

k!(e−uu

)k(φ (u)−φ (1))du

+∫

1+δ

kk+1

k!(e−uu

)k(φ (u)−φ (1))du

Consider the first integral in the above. Letting K be an upper bound for

|φ (u)−φ (1)|

on [0,1] , ∣∣∣∣∫ 1−δ

0

kk+1

k!(e−uu

)k(φ (u)−φ (1))du

∣∣∣∣≤ K∫ 1−δ

0

kk+1

k!(e−uu

)k du

≤ Kkk+1

k!

(e−(1−δ ) (1−δ )

)k(1−δ )

Now this converges to 0 as k→ ∞. In fact, for a < 1, limk→∞kk+1

k! (e−aa)k= 0 because of

the ratio test which shows that for a < 1,∑kkk+1

k! (e−aa)k< ∞ which implies the kth term

converges to 0. Here a = 1−δ . Next consider the last integral. This obviously convergesto 0 because of the exponential growth of φ . In fact,∣∣∣∣∫ ∞

1+δ

kk+1

k!(e−uu

)k(φ (u)−φ (1))du

∣∣∣∣≤ ∫ ∞

1+δ

kk+1

k!(e−uu

)k(

a+beλu)

du

Now changing the variable letting uk = t, and doing everything on finite intervals followedby passing to a limit, the absolute value of the above is dominated by∫

k(1+δ )

kk+1

k!e−t( t

k

)k 1k

(a+beλ (t/k)

)dt

=∫

k(1+δ )

1k!

e−ttk(

a+beλ (t/k))

dt for some a,b≥ 0

=∫

0

1k!

e−ttk(

a+beλ (t/k))

dt−∫ k(1+δ )

0

1k!

e−ttk(

a+beλ (t/k))

dt

However, the limit as k→ ∞ of the integral on the right equals the improper integral onthe left. Thus this converges to 0 as k→ ∞. Thus all that is left to consider is the middleintegral in which δ was chosen such that |φ (u)−φ (1)|< ε. Thus∣∣∣∣∫ 1+δ

1−δ

kk+1

k!(e−uu

)k(φ (u)−φ (1))du

∣∣∣∣≤ ε

∫∞

0

kk+1

k!(e−uu

)k du = ε

4.2, LAPLACE TRANSFORMS 49To see this, use integration by parts.Now assuming that |@ (u)| < Ce", then from what was just shown,KAHL po co pktt“af (eto wau—0(1) = [Ce tu) w)—9 (1) auAssuming @ is continuous at 1, the improper integral is of the form1+6 ikl1-6 i+ _ k 7 A[ sy (e “uy” (@ (u) — 6 (1) du + (e“u)” ( (u) —@ (1)) duk} 1-6 k!co pk+1+f (et (0-9 au146 k!Consider the first integral in the above. Letting K be an upper bound forId (u) — 9 (1)on {0, 1],8 k+l[ ad (e~“u)* (6 (u) — ))du1— OE te kFr <x | ~“u) dukr kRN (e-(0l-8) (1 — _<KT (¢ (1 5)) (1-6). . k+1Now this converges to 0 as k — oo. In fact, for a < 1, limy_5. c (e~4a)* = 0 because ofk reerthe ratio test which shows that for a < 1,)- i ~ (e#a)* < co which implies the k’” termconverges to 0. Here a= 1—6. Next consider the last integral. This obviously convergesto 0 because of the exponential growth of @. In fact,co pktl< | a (e~“u)* (a+be*) dui+6 k!LS et ow) —0(0)) a143 ktNow changing the variable letting uk = t, and doing everything on finite intervals followedby passing to a limit, the absolute value of the above is dominated byFg ae CE) f(a beter) aoo 1_ | wet (at bei) at for some a,b > 0(1+6) K:K(1+8) 4_ et t* A (t/k) _ —t,k A (t/k)=; me (a+be )at [ ue t (a+be )atHowever, the limit as k — © of the integral on the right equals the improper integral onthe left. Thus this converges to 0 as k — co. Thus all that is left to consider is the middleintegral in which 6 was chosen such that | (uw) — @ (1)| < €. Thus1+6 pk+1 a[Fp eto ow 0 (aul se [ (etw)au=e—6