170 CHAPTER 7. THE ABSTRACT LEBESGUE INTEGRAL

Since ε is arbitrary, the two must be equal and they both must equal a. Next supposelimn→∞ an = ∞. Then if l ∈ R, there exists N such that for n≥ N, l ≤ an and therefore, forsuch n,

l ≤ inf{ak : k ≥ n} ≤ sup{ak : k ≥ n}and this shows, since l is arbitrary that liminfn→∞ an = limsupn→∞ an = ∞. The case for−∞ is similar.

Conversely, suppose liminfn→∞ an = limsupn→∞ an = a. Suppose first that a∈R. Then,letting ε > 0 be given, there exists N such that if n≥ N,

sup{ak : k ≥ n}− inf{ak : k ≥ n}< ε

therefore, if k,m > N, and ak > am,

|ak−am|= ak−am ≤ sup{ak : k ≥ n}− inf{ak : k ≥ n}< ε

showing that {an} is a Cauchy sequence. Therefore, it converges to a ∈ R, and as in thefirst part, the liminf and limsup both equal a. If liminfn→∞ an = limsupn→∞ an = ∞, thengiven l ∈ R, there exists N such that for n ≥ N, infn>N an > l. Therefore, limn→∞ an = ∞.The case for −∞ is similar. ■

Here is the dominated convergence theorem.

Theorem 7.8.2 (Dominated Convergence theorem) Let fn ∈ L1(Ω) and suppose

f (ω) = limn→∞

fn(ω),

and there exists a measurable function g, with values in [0,∞],1 such that

| fn(ω)| ≤ g(ω) and∫

g(ω)dµ < ∞.

Then f ∈ L1 (Ω) and

0 = limn→∞

∫| fn− f |dµ = lim

n→∞

∣∣∣∣∫ f dµ−∫

fndµ

∣∣∣∣Proof: f is measurable by Corollary 6.1.4 applied to real and imaginary parts. Since

| f | ≤ g, it follows thatf ∈ L1(Ω) and | f − fn| ≤ 2g.

By Fatou’s lemma (Theorem 7.5.1),∫2gdµ ≤ lim inf

n→∞

∫2g−| f − fn|dµ

=∫

2gdµ− lim supn→∞

∫| f − fn|dµ.

Subtracting∫

2gdµ , 0≤− limsupn→∞

∫| f − fn|dµ. Hence

0 ≥ lim supn→∞

(∫| f − fn|dµ

)≥ lim inf

n→∞

(∫| f − fn|dµ

)≥ lim inf

n→∞

∣∣∣∣∫ f dµ−∫

fndµ

∣∣∣∣≥ 0.

This proves the theorem by Lemma 7.8.1 because the limsup and liminf are equal. ■

1Note that, since g is allowed to have the value ∞, it is not known that g ∈ L1 (Ω) .

170 CHAPTER 7. THE ABSTRACT LEBESGUE INTEGRALSince € is arbitrary, the two must be equal and they both must equal a. Next supposelimy soo dn = 00. Then if 7 € R, there exists N such that for n > N,l < a, and therefore, forsuch n,I< inf{a,:k >n} < sup{a, :k > n}and this shows, since / is arbitrary that liminf,_,..d, = limsup, _,,.dn = 0. The case for—oo ig similar.Conversely, suppose liminf,_,.. d, = limsup,_,.. Gn = a. Suppose first that a € IR. Then,letting € > 0 be given, there exists N such that ifn > N,sup {ag :k >n}—inf{a:k>nb<etherefore, if k,m > N, and az > am,lax — m| = ag — Gm < sup {ag 2k > n}—inf{a rk >nb<eshowing that {a,} is a Cauchy sequence. Therefore, it converges to a € R, and as in thefirst part, the liminf and limsup both equal a. If liminf,_,..a@, = limsup,_,..@n = ©, thengiven / € R, there exists N such that for n > N, inf,sy a, > 1. Therefore, limy 50d) = ©.The case for —o is similar. MiHere is the dominated convergence theorem.Theorem 7.8.2 (Dominated Convergence theorem) Let fy € L'(Q) and supposef(c0) = lim fu(),and there exists a measurable function g, with values in [0,-],' such thatVfa(0)| < (00) and | g(o)du <=.Then f € L' (Q) and0 tim [\f—sldn= tim) [ rau — [ taProof: f is measurable by Corollary 6.1.4 applied to real and imaginary parts. Since|f| < g, it follows thatf €L(Q) and | f — fy| < 2g.By Fatou’s lemma (Theorem 7.5.1),[esau < tim int, [2¢ [fF fuldwn—-oo[dn —lim sup [ \f— faldu.nooSubtracting {2gdu,0< —limsup,,,.. f |f—fnldu. Hence0 > limsup (/ir—tnian)lim inf (/ir—mnian) > lim int [ran [toa >0.This proves the theorem by Lemma 7.8.1 because the limsup and liminf are equal. MiVIV'Note that, since g is allowed to have the value o, it is not known that g € L! (Q).