644 CHAPTER 32. MEASURES AND INTEGRALS

Definition 32.6.1 Let (Ω,F , µ) be a measure space and suppose f : Ω → [0,∞] ismeasurable. Then define∫

f dµ ≡∫

0µ ([ f > λ ])dλ =

∫∞

0µ(

f−1 (λ ,∞))

which makes sense because λ → µ ([ f > λ ]) is nonnegative and decreasing. On the rightyou have an improper Riemann integral like what was discussed above.

Note that if f ≤ g, then∫

f dµ ≤∫

gdµ because µ ([ f > λ ])≤ µ ([g > λ ]) . Next I pointout that the integral is a limit of lower sums.

Lemma 32.6.2 In the situation of the above definition,∫f dµ = sup

h>0

∑i=1

µ ([ f > hi])h

Proof: Let m(h,R) ∈ N satisfy R−h < hm(h,R)≤ R. Then

limR→∞

m(h,R) = ∞

and so ∫f dµ ≡

∫∞

0µ ([ f > λ ])dλ = sup

Msup

R

∫ R

0µ ([ f > λ ])∧Mdλ =

supM

supR>0

suph>0

m(h,R)

∑k=1

(µ ([ f > kh])∧M)h+(µ ([ f > R])∧M)(R−hm(h,R)) (32.11)

= supM

supR>0

suph>0

m(h,R)

∑k=1

(µ ([ f > kh])∧M)h

because the sum in 32.11 is just a lower sum for the integral∫ R

0 µ ([ f > λ ])∧Mdλ , theselower sums are increasing, and the last term is smaller than Mh. Hence, switching the orderof the sups, this equals

supR>0

suph>0

supM

m(h,R)

∑k=1

(µ ([ f > kh])∧M)h = supR>0

suph>0

limM→∞

m(h,R)

∑k=1

(µ ([ f > kh])∧M)h

= suph>0

supR

m(R,h)

∑k=1

(µ ([ f > kh]))h = suph>0

∑k=1

(µ ([ f > kh]))h.

32.7 Nonnegative Simple FunctionsTo begin with, here is a useful lemma.

Lemma 32.7.1 If f (λ ) = 0 for all λ > a, where f is a decreasing nonnegative function,then ∫

0f (λ )dλ =

∫ a

0f (λ )dλ .

644 CHAPTER 32. MEASURES AND INTEGRALSDefinition 32.6.1 Le (Q, F, WL) be a measure space and suppose f : Q — [0,°] ismeasurable. Then define[ fan= [He ([f >A])da = [u (f-! (A,02)) dawhich makes sense because A — 1 ([f > A]) is nonnegative and decreasing. On the rightyou have an improper Riemann integral like what was discussed above.Note that if f < g, then [f fdu < f gdu because p ([f > A]) <u ([g > A]). Next I pointout that the integral is a limit of lower sums.Lemma 32.6.2 In the situation of the above definition,[fan =sup 1 ( [f > hil) hh>0 j=Proof: Let m(h,R) € N satisfy R—h < hm(h,R) < R. Thenlim m(h,R) = 0Rooand so00 R[taw= [ wilr> Alaa =supsup fw ([f > al) amaa =JO M R JOm(h,R)sup sup sup Dd (u (Lf > kh]) AM)h+ (uw ([f > R])AM)(R—hm(h,R)) (32.11)M R>O0h>0 f=m(h,R)= sup sup sup Ye (u [f > kh]) AM)hM R>0h>0 f=]because the sum in 32.11 is just a lower sum for the integral Sou ([f > A]) AMadd, theselower sums are increasing, and the last term is smaller than Mh. Hence, switching the orderof the sups, this equalsm(h,R) m(h,R)sup sup sup yy (u ([f > kh]) AM)h= supsup 1 lim y? (u(Lf > kh]) \M)hR>0h>0 M j=] R>0n>0M>% (=m(R,h) 0°=supsup )’ (u([f > kAj)) )h=sup Yo ( ([f>kh]))h. OWn>0 R fa h>0 k=132.7 Nonnegative Simple FunctionsTo begin with, here is a useful lemma.Lemma 32.7.1 /f f(A) =O/forall A > a, where f is a decreasing nonnegative function,hen[ faar= [raya