614 CHAPTER 31. CURVILINEAR COORDINATES

Thus there is at most one choice of scalars v j such that v = v jej and it is given by 31.3.(

v−v ·e jej) ·ek = 0

and so, since {ei}pi=1 is a basis, (

v−v ·e jej) ·w = 0

for all vectors w. It follows v−v ·e jej = 0 and this shows

{ei}p

i=1 is a basis.In the above argument are obtained formulas for the components of a vector v, vi,

with respect to the dual basis, found to be v j = v ·e j. In the same way, one can find thecomponents of a vector with respect to the basis {ei}p

i=1 . Let v be any vector and let

v = v je j. (31.4)

Then taking the dot product of both sides of 31.4 with ei we see vi = ei ·v.Does there exist a dual basis and is it uniquely determined?

Theorem 31.1.4 If {ei}pi=1 is a basis for Rp, then there exists a unique dual basis,{

e j}p

j=1 satisfying

e j ·ei = δji .

Proof: First I show the dual basis is unique. Suppose{f j}p

j=1 is another set of vectors

which satisfies f j ·ei = δji . Then

f j = f j ·eiei = δ

ji e

i = e j.

Note that from the definition, the dual basis to{i j}p

j=1 is just i j = i j. It remains to verifythe existence of the dual basis. Consider the matrix gi j ≡ ei ·e j. This is called the metrictensor. If the resulting matrix is denoted as G, does it follow that G−1 exists? Suppose youhave ei ·e jx j = 0. Then, since i is arbitrary, this implies e jx j = 0 and since

{e j}

is a basis,this requires each x j to be zero. Thus G is invertible. Denote by gi j the i jth entry of thisinverse matrix. Consider e j ≡ g jkek. Is this the dual basis as the notation implies?

e j ·ei = g jkek ·ei = g jkgki = δji

so yes, it is indeed the dual basis. This has shown both existence and uniqueness of thedual basis.

From this is a useful observation.

Proposition 31.1.5 {ei}pi=1 is a basis for Rp if and only if when ei = a j

i i j, det(

a ji

)̸=

0.

Proof: First suppose {ei}pi=1 is a basis for Rp. Letting Ai j ≡ a j

i , we need to show thatdet(A) ̸= 0. This is equivalent to showing that A or AT is one to one. But

a ji xi = 0 ⇒ a j

i xii j = 0 ⇒ eixi = 0 ⇒ xi = 0

so AT is one to one if and only if det(A) = det(AT)̸= 0.

614 CHAPTER 31. CURVILINEAR COORDINATESThus there is at most one choice of scalars v; such that v =v je! and it is given by 31.3.(v—v-eje/)-e, =0Ppand so, since {e;};_, is a basis,(v—v-eje/)-w=0for all vectors w. It follows v — v- eje/ = 0 and this shows {e'}?_, isa basis.In the above argument are obtained formulas for the components of a vector v, vj,with respect to the dual basis, found to be v; = v-e;. In the same way, one can find thecomponents of a vector with respect to the basis {e; an . Let v be any vector and letv=we;. (31.4)Then taking the dot product of both sides of 31.4 with e! we see v' = e!- v.Does there exist a dual basis and is it uniquely determined?Theorem 31.1.4 If {e;}?_, is a basis for R?, then there exists a unique dual basis,{e/}i satisfyinge!-e;= 6).Proof: First I show the dual basis is unique. Suppose { fi ye , is another set of vectorswhich satisfies f/-e; = 5! Thenfi=fi-ee =6le =e.Note that from the definition, the dual basis to {i isin is just i/ =3 j- It remains to verifythe existence of the dual basis. Consider the matrix g;; = e;-e;. This is called the metrictensor. If the resulting matrix is denoted as G, does it follow that G~! exists? Suppose youhave e;-e;x/ = 0. Then, since i is arbitrary, this implies e ;x/ = 0 and since {e;} is a basis,this requires each x/ to be zero. Thus G is invertible. Denote by g’/ the ij’” entry of thisinverse matrix. Consider e/ = g/*e,. Is this the dual basis as the notation implies?; 1 1 .e! -e; = gl ex -€; = 9! aki = 5}so yes, it is indeed the dual basis. This has shown both existence and uniqueness of thedual basis. JjFrom this is a useful observation.Proposition 31.1.5 {e;}?_, is a basis for R? if and only if when e; = aliy, det (a!) #0.Proof: First suppose {e;}/_, is a basis for R?. Letting Aj; = a! , we need to show thatdet (A) #0. This is equivalent to showing that A or A” is one to one. Butaix' =0=> alx't; =0> ex' =0>x' =0so A” is one to one if and only if det (A) = det (A’) £0.