900 CHAPTER 33. QUADRATIC VARIATION AND STOCHASTIC INTEGRATION

=mn−1

∑k=0

f (tnk )

((M (t ∧σ ∧ tk+1)−M (t ∧σn∧ tk+1))−(M (t ∧σ ∧ tk)− (M (t ∧σn∧ tk)))

)Now from maximal theorems,

E

(sup

t∈[0,T ]

∥∥∥∥∫ t∧σ

0fndM−

∫ t∧σn

0fndM

∥∥∥∥2)

≤ E

(∥∥∥∥∫ T∧σ

0fndM−

∫ T∧σn

0fndM

∥∥∥∥2)

= E

(∑

mn−1k=0

∥∥ f(tnk

)(M (σ ∧ tk+1)−M (σn∧ tk+1))

∥∥2

+∥∥ f(tnk

)(M (σ ∧ tk)− (M (σn∧ tk)))

∥∥2

)+?? (33.28)

where ?? is −2 times the expectation of a sum of mixed terms which can be written in thefollowing form after noticing that M (σ ∧ tk)− (M (σn∧ tk)) is Ftk measurable.

E(

f(tnk

)∗ f(tnk

)M (σ ∧ tk)

−(M (σn∧ tk)) ,E(M (σ ∧ tk+1)−M (σn∧ tk+1) |Ftk

) )= E

(f (tn

k )∗ f (tn

k )M (σ ∧ tk)− (M (σn∧ tk)) ,M (σ ∧ tk)−M (σn∧ tk))

= E(∥ f (tn

k )(M (σ ∧ tk)−M (σn∧ tk))∥2)

Therefore 33.28 reduces to

E

(∑

mn−1k=0

∥∥ f(tnk

)(M (σ ∧ tk+1)−M (σn∧ tk+1))

∥∥2

−∥∥ f(tnk

)(M (σ ∧ tk)− (M (σn∧ tk)))

∥∥2

)= E

(∥ f (T )(M (T ∧σ )−M (T ∧σn ))∥2

)This converges to 0 because the integrand converges to 0 since σn (ω)→ σ (ω) and theintegrand is uniformly bounded by assumption. Thus this has shown that

E

(sup

t∈[0,T ]

∥∥∥∥∫ t∧σ

0fndM−

∫ t∧σn

0fndM

∥∥∥∥2)→ 0.

This has shown the following technical lemma.

Lemma 33.3.4 Letting f be bounded and continuous in t and adapted and letting M bea bounded continuous martingale, and σn the discrete approximation of a stopping time σ

and fn the elementary function approximating f as described above, then it follows that

E

(sup

t∈[0,T ]

∥∥∥∥∫ t∧σ

0fndM−

∫ t∧σn

0fndM

∥∥∥∥2)→ 0.

Theorem 33.3.5 Definition 33.3.3, is well defined and∫ t

0 f X[0,σ ]dM is a martin-gale equal to

∫ t∧σ

0 f dM. Also, there is a set of measure zero N and a subsequence, stilldenoted as n such that for ω /∈ N,∫ t

0fnX[0,σn]dM (ω)→

∫ t

0f X[0,σ ]dM (ω) (33.29)

uniformly in t ∈ [0,T ].

900 CHAPTER 33. QUADRATIC VARIATION AND STOCHASTIC INTEGRATIONin| M(tAOAte1) -—M (tA On Atgs1))> F( %) (™ M(tAo A) — (M(tAGnAt))) )Now from maximal theorems,t\O t\On 2E ( sup pfu — | tn )t€(0,7] 0TAo TAOn 2< E | pram — [of0 0E veto Il f (2) (M oe tonne IE 499 (33.28)“EME (ee) (Mt (OA ty) —(M (On Atk)) |’where ?? is —2 times the expectation of a sum ae mixed terms which can be written in thefollowing form after noticing that M(o A t,) —(M (On Atg)) is F;, measurable.Fy f(t eM (oA) )E(_ —(M( On Atg)) ,E (M( OA te+1) —M (on A te+1) | Fr)E (f(t) f (2) M(O Ate) —(M (Gn Ate) ,M(O Ate) —M (On At)E (lf) (M (on) —M (on An))|l)Therefore 33.28 reduces to(= Lito. lif (ee) (M oe ion ne IE )= |f (@) (Mo \n) —(M (on An))) |= e(yrtrintr ney _weraony)This converges to 0 because the integrand converges to 0 since 0, (@) — o(q@) and theintegrand is uniformly bounded by assumption. Thus this has shown that2E| sup > 0.te [0,7]This has shown the following technical lemma.Lemma 33.3.4 Letting f be bounded and continuous int and adapted and letting M bea bounded continuous martingale, and Oy, the discrete approximation of a stopping time 0and f, the elementary function approximating f as described above, then it follows that1AOnsup i fndM — [ Sn > 0.te[0,7]Theorem 33.3.5 Definition 33.3.3, is well defined and Jo f 20,0)4M is a martin-“°t\ot\Onfram — [fa00gale equal to fdM. Also, there is a set of measure zero N and a subsequence, stilldenoted asn such that for o ¢ N,t t[ frFoaiaM () + | £Zo.0,dM (0) (33.29)uniformly int € [0,T].