32.3. THE QUADRATIC VARIATION 869
and so from Proposition 32.1.4 applied to ξ k ≡M(τ
n+1′k
)−M
(τ
n+1k
),
E(∥Pn (t)−Pn+1 (t)∥2
)≤(
2−2nE(∥M (t)∥2
)). (32.9)
Now t→ Pn (t) is continuous because it is a finite sum of continuous functions. It is alsothe case that {Pn (t)} is a martingale. To see this use Lemma 32.1.1. Let σ be a stoppingtime having two values. Then using Corollary 32.1.3 and the Doob optional samplingtheorem, Theorem 31.3.16
E
(q
∑k=0
(M (τn
k) ,(M(σ ∧ τ
nk+1)−M (σ ∧ τ
nk))))
=q
∑k=0
E((
M (τnk) ,(M(σ ∧ τ
nk+1)−M (σ ∧ τ
nk))))
=q
∑k=0
E((
E(M (τn
k) ,(M(σ ∧ τ
nk+1)−M (σ ∧ τ
nk)))|Fτn
k
))=
q
∑k=0
E((
M (τnk) ,E
(M(σ ∧ τ
nk+1)−M (σ ∧ τ
nk))|Fτn
k
))=
q
∑k=0
E((
M (τnk) ,E
(M(σ ∧ τ
nk+1∧ τ
nk)−M (σ ∧ τ
nk))))
= 0
Note the Doob theorem applies because σ ∧τnk+1 is a bounded stopping time due to the fact
σ has only two values. Similarly
E
(q
∑k=0
(M (τn
k) ,(M(t ∧ τ
nk+1)−M (t ∧ τ
nk))))
=q
∑k=0
E((
M (τnk) ,(M(t ∧ τ
nk+1)−M (t ∧ τ
nk))))
=q
∑k=0
E((
E(M (τn
k) ,(M(t ∧ τ
nk+1)−M (t ∧ τ
nk)))|Fτn
k
))=
q
∑k=0
E((
M (τnk) ,E
(M(t ∧ τ
nk+1)−M (t ∧ τ
nk))|Fτn
k
))=
q
∑k=0
E((
M (τnk) ,E
(M(t ∧ τ
nk+1∧ τ
nk)−M (t ∧ τ
nk))))
= 0
It follows each partial sum for Pn (t) is a martingale. As shown above, these partial sumsconverge in L2 (Ω) and so it follows that Pn (t) is also a martingale. Note the Doob theoremapplies because t ∧ τn
k+1 is a bounded stopping time.I want to argue that Pn is a Cauchy sequence in M 2
T (R). By Theorem 31.4.3 andcontinuity of Pn which yields appropriate measurability in supt≤T |Pn (t)−Pn+1 (t)| ,
E
((supt≤T|Pn (t)−Pn+1 (t)|
)2)1/2
≤ 2E(|Pn (T )−Pn+1 (T )|2
)1/2
32.3. THE QUADRATIC VARIATION 869and so from Proposition 32.1.4 applied to §, = M (tit!) —M (ti"'),E(IIP()—Pasi ll’) < (2% (MM IP)) (32.9)Now t — P,, (t) is continuous because it is a finite sum of continuous functions. It is alsothe case that {P, (t)} is a martingale. To see this use Lemma 32.1.1. Let o be a stoppingtime having two values. Then using Corollary 32.1.3 and the Doob optional samplingtheorem, Theorem 31.3.16E (x (M(t). (M(OAt%41) -M(ons)))k=0((M (ti), (M (OA t,,) —M(OATt))))TMsbs>lloE((E(M (zh), (M(oA thy.) —M(oAzh))) |Fet))IMsiroOIMs& ((M (af) 6 (M (oA th.) -M(oA 2) |Fa))ioOE((M(z}).E(M (6 At}, Ath) —M(oAth)))) =0l|MsirOoNote the Doob theorem applies because o / T, , is a bounded stopping time due to the facto has only two values. SimilarlyE (x (M (ct), (M (th) -mune))k=0((M (ti) (MA th) — M(t %2))))l|IMsbry8) (M(t th,1) —M (ch) Fer) )>llo(M(x) E(M (tA th) —M (tA th) \Fxt))II lIMs iMses] es]a.es]=airoE((M(ti),E(M (tA ti, At) —M (tA t%)))) =0IMsioIt follows each partial sum for P, (t) is a martingale. As shown above, these partial sumsconverge in L? (Q) and so it follows that P, (t) is also a martingale. Note the Doob theoremapplies because ¢ \ Tj, , is a bounded stopping time.I want to argue that P, is a Cauchy sequence in M; (R). By Theorem 31.4.3 andcontinuity of P, which yields appropriate measurability in sup,_r |P, (t) — Pai (t)|,1/23\ 1/2E [(wpi (t) — Prva ol) <2E ((P (7) — Past (7)")t<T