31.3. DOOB OPTIONAL SAMPLING CONTINUOUS CASE 835

Definition 31.3.1 A normal filtration is one which satisfies the following :

1. F0 contains all A ∈F such that P(A) = 0. Here F is the σ algebra which containsall Ft .

2. Ft = Ft+ for all t ∈ I where Ft+ ≡ ∩s>tFs.

For an F measurable [0,∞) valued function τ to be a stopping time, we want to havethe stopped process Xτ defined by Xτ (t)(ω)≡ X (t ∧ τ (ω))(ω) to be adapted whenever Xis right continuous and adapted. Thus a stopping time is a measurable function which canbe used to stop the process while retaining the property of being adapted. The definition ofsuch a condition which will make τ a stopping time is the same as in the case of a discreetprocess.

Definition 31.3.2 τ an F measurable function is a stopping time if [τ ≤ t] ∈Ft .

Then this definition does what is desired. This is in the following proposition. Forconvenience, here is a definition.

Definition 31.3.3 Let {t}k ≡ 2−kn where n is as large as possible and have 2−kn≤t.

It seems like the theory is based on reducing to discrete stopping times defined asfollows.

Definition 31.3.4

τk (ω)≡∞

∑n=0

Xτ−1((n2−k,(n+1)2−k]) (ω)(n+1)2−k.

Thus τk has values in the set{

n2−k}∞

n=0 ,τk ≥ τ and τk is within 2−k of τ .

Then τk is a discrete stopping time with respect to the increasing σ algebras F{t}k .This is in the following lemma.

Lemma 31.3.5 Let τ be a stopping time and let τk be defined above in Definition 31.3.4.Then [τk ≤ {t}k] ∈F{t}k and for all t, [τk ≤ t] ∈Ft . If you have finitely many stoppingtimes

{σ k}n

k=1 for n < ∞ then σ ≡min{

σ k}n

k=1 and σ ≡max{

σ k}n

k=1 are also stoppingtimes.

Proof: If t = (n+1)2−k then [τk ≤ {t}k] is the same as[τ ≤ (n+1)2−k

]= [τ ≤ t] ∈

Ft =F{t}k . The other case is where for some n, t ∈(n2−k,(n+1)2−k

). Then {t}k = n2−k

and so [τk ≤ {t}k] is[τ ≤ n2−k

]∈Fn2−k = F{t}k . Thus, in particular, [τk ≤ t] ∈Ft since

{t}k ≤ t.As to the second claim,[

min{

σk}n

k=1≤ t]= ∪n

k=1

k ≤ t]∈Ft

and[max

{σ k}n

k=1 ≤ t]= ∩n

k=1

[σ k ≤ t

]∈Ft . ■

31.3. DOOB OPTIONAL SAMPLING CONTINUOUS CASE 835Definition 31.3.1 A normal filtration is one which satisfies the following :1. Fo contains all A € F such that P(A) =0. Here F is the o algebra which containsall F;.2. F¥:= F,4 for allt € I where Fy4. = Oss Fs.For an ¥Y measurable [0,°°) valued function Tt to be a stopping time, we want to havethe stopped process X* defined by X* (t) (@) = X (t \T(@)) (@) to be adapted whenever Xis right continuous and adapted. Thus a stopping time is a measurable function which canbe used to stop the process while retaining the property of being adapted. The definition ofsuch a condition which will make Tt a stopping time is the same as in the case of a discreetprocess.Definition 31.3.2 ¢ an F measurable function is a stopping time if [t < t] € F,.Then this definition does what is desired. This is in the following proposition. Forconvenience, here is a definition.Definition 31.3.3 Ler {t}, =2-*n where n is as large as possible and have 2-*n <t.It seems like the theory is based on reducing to discrete stopping times defined asfollows.Definition 31.3.4T(@) = » oa ((n2-k,(n+1)2-4) (@) (n+1) 2",Thus Tt; has values in the set {n2*\" 7% > T and T; is within 2~* of t.Then Tz is a discrete stopping time with respect to the increasing o algebras FiniThis is in the following lemma.Lemma 31.3.5 Let t be a stopping time and let t; be defined above in Definition 31.3.4.Then [ty < {t},] © Fey, and for all t, [t, <1] © F;. If you have finitely many stopping. kyn oo. kyr _ k\n .times {o yea forn < then o = min {o yet and 0 = max {o det are also stoppingtimes.Proof: If t = (n+1)2~ then [t; < {t},] is the same as [t < (n+1)2~] =[t<t]€F, = F1,,,. The other case is where for some n, t € (n2~*, (n+ 1)2~*). Then {t}, =n2~*and so [ty < {t},] is [t <2] € Fyn = Fy ,. Thus, in particular, [t, <1] € F; since{thy St.As to the second claim,nimin {of} <+| =U} lof <¢| € F;k=1and [max {o*}7_ < t| = Mer [o* < t| c ¥,. 0