11.3. DIVERGENCE THEOREM 271

Now for i < p, that in the integrand is not ∂

∂xi(ψFi)(x̂,y+g(x̂)) . Indeed, by the chain

rule,

∂xi(ψFi)(x̂,y+g(x̂)) = Di (ψFi)(x̂,y+g(x̂))+Dp (ψFi)(x̂,y+g(x̂))

∂g(x̂)∂xi

Since spt(ψ)⊆ Q, it follows that 11.12 reduces to∫ 0

−∞

∫Q̂

∂xi(ψFi)(x̂,y+g(x̂))dx̂dy−

∫Q̂

∫ 0

−∞

Dp (ψFi)(x̂,y+g(x̂))∂g(x̂)

∂xidydx̂

= 0−∫

Q̂(ψFi)(x̂,g(x̂))dx̂

Case that i = p : In this case, 11.12 becomes∫

Q̂ (ψFp)(x̂,g(x̂))dx̂. Recall how it

was just shown that the unit normal is

(−gx1 ,...,−gxp−1 ,1

)√

∑p−1i=1 g2

xk+1

and dσ =√

∑p−1i=1 g2

xk+1dmp−1.

Then the above reduces to∫

∂ (Q∩U) (ψF ) ·ndσ . The same result will hold for all the Qi.The sign changes if in the situation of 11.9. As to Q0,

∫Q0 ∑i (ψ0F)i,i (x)dmp = 0 because

spt(ψ0)⊆ Q0. Returning to 11.11, it follows that

∫U

∑i

Fi,i (x)dmp =N

∑k=0

∫Qk

∑i(ψkF)i,i (x)dmp =

N

∑k=0

∫Qk

∑i(ψkF)i,i (x)dmp

=N

∑k=1

∫∂ (Qk∩U)

(ψkF ) ·ndσ =N

∑k=1

∫∂U

(ψkF ) ·ndσ

=∫

∂U

(N

∑k=0

ψk

)F ·ndσ =

∫∂U

F ·ndσ ■

Definition 11.3.5 The expression ∑pi=1 Fi,i (x) is called div(F ) . It is defined above

in terms of the coordinates with respect to a fixed orthonormal basis (e1, · · · ,ep). However,it does not depend on such a particular choice for coordinates.

If you had some other orthonormal basis (v1, · · · ,vp) and if (y1, · · · ,yp) are the coordi-nates of a point z with respect to this other orthonormal system, then there is an orthogonalmatrix Q such that y = Qx for y the coordinate vector for the new basis and x the coordi-nate vector for the old basis. Then

Ji (x)≡(det(DR−1

i (x)∗DR−1i (x)

))1/2=(

det((

DR−1i (y)Q

)∗DR−1

i (y)Q))1/2

=(det(Q∗DR−1

i (y)∗DR−1i (y)Q

))1/2=(det(Q∗DR−1

i (y)∗DR−1i (y)Q

))1/2= Ji (y)

so the two definitions of dσ will be the same with either set of coordinates.List the vi in the order which will give det(Q) = 1. That is to say, the two bases have

the same orientation.The insistence that detQ = 1 will ensure that the unit normal vectorsdefined as above will point away from U . Thus we could take the divergence with respect

11.3. DIVERGENCE THEOREM 271Now for i < p, that in the integrand is not 2. (WF;) (@,y +g (&)). Indeed, by the chaintule,dg (#)(whi) (y+ 8(@)) = Di (Whi (y+ 8(®)) + Dp (WR) (y+ @(@)) EESince spt(y) C Q, it follows that 11.12 reduces to[. | (Wi) (@.y +8 (&)) dédy — [ [> (WF) (@,y +8 (#)) 76) aya=0~ | (ye) (@.8(@))a8Case that i = p: In this case, 11.12 becomes Jig (WFp) (&,g (&))d&. Recall how it8x7 0 8x 1 _was just shown that the unit normal is Cee rty 1) and do = Jr 8, + ldmp_1.Y= 8x, 01Then the above reduces to {agqy) (WF) -ndo. The same result will hold for all the Q;.The sign changes if in the situation of 11.9. As to Qo, fg, Li(WoF);; (x) dmp = 0 becausespt(Wo) C Qo. Returning to 11.11, it follows thatN N[LAs mamp=¥ [| Lew iisloddmy=¥ f) Vvutial@) amN N 1F)-ndo = / F)-ndoY row Me) Y hy MP)N[ ( vy) Pena | F-ndo @Definition 11.3.5 The expression ye, Fii (ax) is called div (F’). It is defined abovein terms of the coordinates with respect to a fixed orthonormal basis (€1,--- ,e@p). However,it does not depend on such a particular choice for coordinates.If you had some other orthonormal basis (v,--- ,v,) and if (y1,--- , yp) are the coordi-nates of a point z with respect to this other orthonormal system, then there is an orthogonalmatrix Q such that y = Qa for y the coordinate vector for the new basis and a the coordi-nate vector for the old basis. Then1/2Ji (x) = (det (DR;! (x)* DR; !(a)))'? = (aet ((DR;' (y)Q)* DR;"(y) ¢))"”1/2 1/2= (det (O*DR; ' (y)* DR;' (y)Q)) “= (det (Q*DR;' (y)* DR; ' (y)Q)) ~ =Ji(y)so the two definitions of do will be the same with either set of coordinates.List the v; in the order which will give det (Q) = 1. That is to say, the two bases havethe same orientation.The insistence that detQ = | will ensure that the unit normal vectorsdefined as above will point away from U. Thus we could take the divergence with respect