11.1. MANIFOLDS 263

where here there is α > 0 such that∣∣DS−1 (S (R−1 (x)))(

S(R−1 (x+h)

)−S

(R−1 (x)

))∣∣≥ α

∣∣(S (R−1 (x+h))−S

(R−1 (x)

))∣∣thanks to the assumption that DS−1 (S (R−1 (x)

))is one to one. Thus from 11.2

α

2

∣∣(S (R−1 (x+h))−S

(R−1 (x)

))∣∣≤ ∣∣DR−1 (x)h+o(h)∣∣ (11.3)

Now ∣∣o(S (R−1 (x+h))−S

(R−1 (x)

))∣∣|h|

≤∣∣o(S (R−1 (x+h)

)−S

(R−1 (x)

))∣∣∣∣S (R−1 (x+h))−S

(R−1 (x)

)∣∣∣∣S (R−1 (x+h)

)−S

(R−1 (x)

)∣∣|h|

From 11.3, the second factor in the above is bounded. Now continuity of S ◦R−1 impliesthat as h→ 0, the first factor also converges to 0. Thus

o(S(R−1 (x+h)

)−S

(R−1 (x)

))= o(h)

Returning to 11.2,

DR−1 (x)h+o(h) = DS−1 (S (R−1 (x)))(

S ◦R−1 (x+h)−S ◦R−1 (x))

Thus if h= tv,

limt→0

DS−1 (S (R−1 (x)))((S ◦R−1 (x+ tv)−S ◦R−1 (x)

)t

)

= DR−1 (x)v+ limt→0

o(tv)t

= DR−1 (x)v

By the above lemma, limt→0(S◦R−1(x+tv)−S◦R−1(x))

t = Dv

(S ◦R−1)(x) exists. Also

DS−1 (S (R−1 (x)))

Dv

(S ◦R−1)(x) = DR−1 (x)v

Let A(x) ≡ DS−1 (S (R−1 (x)))

. Then A∗A is invertible and x→ A(x) is continuous.Then

A(x)∗A(x)Dv

(S ◦R−1)(x) = A(x)∗DR−1 (x)v

Dv

(S ◦R−1)(x) =

(A(x)∗A(x)

)−1 A(x)∗DR−1 (x)v

so Dv

(S ◦R−1)(x) is continuous. It follows from Theorem 6.6.1 that S ◦R−1 is a func-

tion in C1(R(U ∩V

))because the Gateaux derivatives exist and are continuous. ■

Saying DR−1 (x) is one to one is the analog of the situation in calculus with a smoothcurve in which we assume the derivative is non zero and that the parametrization has con-tinuous derivative.

I will assume in what follows that Ω is a compact subset of Rq, q ≥ p. You could getby with less using Stone’s theorem about paracompactness but this is enough for what willbe used here.

11.1. MANIFOLDS 263where here there is & > 0 such thatIDs"! (Ss (Re (x))) (S(Ro om S(R! (x)))|> a|(S(Ro ne S(R'(«)))|(thanks to the assumption that DS~! (S (R7' («))) is one to one. Thus from 11.25 |(S(R '(a+h))—S (Ro! (x)))| <|DR (x) h+o0(h)| (11.3)Now|o(S(R''(x+h))—S(R'(a)))||h|lo(S(R-'(x+h))—S(R'(x)))||S(R'(a+h))—S(R'(a))|~~ |S (Ro! (@+h))-S(R'(a))| [P|From 11.3, the second factor in the above is bounded. Now continuity of So R™! impliesthat as h — 0, the first factor also converges to 0. Thus0(S(R'(e©+h)) —$(R'(x))) =0(h)Returning to 11.2,DR! (x)h+o(h)=DS"'(S(R"!(x))) (SoR'(a+h)—SoR'(a))Thus ifh =tv,t>0 tlim DS™! (S (R7'(a))) ( (SoR™ (@+tv)~SoR (2)= DR! (a) v + lim 20%) =DR™' (x)vtt0(Sor! (a+tv)—SoR! (x))tDS™'(S(R™! (x))) Dy (SoR"') (x) =DR! (x) vBy the above lemma, lim,_59 =D, (S ° R') (a) exists. AlsoLet A(x) = DS“! (S(R™!(a))). Then A*A is invertible and 2 — A (a) is continuous.ThenA(«)*A(x)Dy(SoR™')(x) = A(x)*DR™'(ax)vDy(SoR")(a) = (A(x)*A(a)) 'A(a)*DR(x)vso Dy (So R~') (x) is continuous. It follows from Theorem 6.6.1 that So R7! is a func-tion in C! (R (UAV)) because the Gateaux derivatives exist and are continuous. HiSaying DR! (a) is one to one is the analog of the situation in calculus with a smoothcurve in which we assume the derivative is non zero and that the parametrization has con-tinuous derivative.I will assume in what follows that Q is a compact subset of R‘4, g > p. You could getby with less using Stone’s theorem about paracompactness but this is enough for what willbe used here.